Delhi High Court
31,024 judgments
Abhay Singh v. Airports Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a non-tenure transfer order, holding that transfers made in accordance with transfer policy and accepted by the employee are not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or policy violation.
NEXIM EXPORTS PVT LTD & ANR. v. B B PATEL & ANR.
The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders in execution proceedings and dismissed the petition accordingly.
MINOSHA INDIA LIMITED v. MR. DEEPAK TIWARI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions under Section 115 CPC are barred against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts by Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, and constitutional jurisdiction under Article 227 must be exercised sparingly in such cases.
Suresh Malhotra v. Ballabh Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging non-impounding of insufficiently stamped documents, allowing the petitioner to seek appropriate relief before the trial court without delaying cross-examination.
Krishan Kumar Mishra v. Annu Goyal
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the jurisdictional challenge under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and kept the Order XVA CPC order in abeyance pending such adjudication.
Santosh Devi v. Naveen Kumar
The High Court granted the plaintiff a final opportunity to lead remaining evidence despite prior closure of evidence by the Trial Court, balancing delay concerns with the right to a fair trial.
Senator Wood Pvt Ltd v. Babu Lal Patel & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging an order under Order XV-A CPC in view of a pending review application, reserving parties' rights and permitting a fresh petition if aggrieved.
Manoj Babbar & Anr. v. Dr. Er. Rajainderr Jaina & Ors.
The High Court condoned delay in filing written statement by defendants who claimed non-receipt of complete plaint, allowing their written statement on record subject to costs, emphasizing promptness in seeking relief.
Ms. Manu Prakash Upadhyay and Mr. Dhanesh M Nair v. Dr Vijay Kumar
The High Court declined to interfere under Article 227 with the Trial Court's dismissal of an application at an advanced trial stage, directing the petitioner to raise the issue in appeal against the final decree.
Rajesh @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR and all related proceedings following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Shubhwati v. Alka Rastogi
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking handwriting examination of a disputed cheque signature in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused must timely lead evidence to rebut the presumption of genuineness.
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Limited v. Precision Technik Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that delays caused by foreseeable bureaucratic processes and PTPL's own negligence do not constitute force majeure under the PPA, upheld NTPC's partial retention of the Performance Bank Guarantee, and limited judicial interference in arbitral awards to prescribed grounds.
Kailash Chand Mittal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral dues must accrue from the date of retirement, not after a 45-day grace period, and remanded the issue of the interest rate to the Tribunal's Full Bench.
Gayathri v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the medical disqualification of a candidate with an ASD closure device for Indian Air Force recruitment, dismissing her petition challenging refusal of a Review Medical Board.
Hritik Yadav v. Director General, Railway Protection Force
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Hrithik Yadav as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s counsel seeking leave to withdraw the petition.
Saurabh Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, applying established Supreme Court principles.
Nitin & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354-B and 323 IPC following a bona fide amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's power to promote peace by ending futile criminal proceedings.
Harshwati v. National Law University Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the interim order allowing recruitment to continue subject to the writ petition's outcome, holding that regularisation is a final relief requiring full adjudication.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Hav MACP NB Sub Dileep Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Manjeet Kumar Ramprakash Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking acceptance of resignation by directing the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and pass reasoned orders within four weeks.