Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Saroj Bala v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.

21 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking allotment of flats under the Punjab Migrants Rehabilitation Scheme, holding that administrative decisions based on adverse fraud investigations cannot be interfered with absent patent illegality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Housing Scheme for Rehabilitation of Punjab Migrants HSRPM Delhi Development Authority Economic Offences Wing

Pawan Kumar v. Prakarti Rawat

21 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6162

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of the petitioner's right to lead evidence in a motor accident claim, holding that the petitioner failed to avail a final opportunity granted to summon witnesses.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Motor Accident Claims Tribunal summoning witness final opportunity

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Manoj Kumar

21 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5876-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing equal relaxation in recruitment tests for respondents, ruling that arbitrary denial of such relaxation without reasons is unsustainable.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant discretionary power relaxation in recruitment arbitrariness discrimination

Hiran v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

21 Jul 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:5872

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for kidnapping and penetrative sexual assault of a minor under IPC and POCSO Act, affirming the reliability of the victim's testimony and statutory presumptions despite absence of DNA evidence and independent witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault child victim statutory presumption

Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Sub Vikram Singh

21 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting its review to jurisdictional errors.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Major Anish Muralidhar Army v. EX NK Krishnarao Gurugubelli

21 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension primary hypertension armed forces Release Medical Board

Anish Muralidhar Army v. Ex Sub Niraj Ranjan JC 377479Y

21 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:5880-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Prem Raj Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5968

The Delhi High Court directed the Labour Tribunal to permit evidence before deciding a retired workman's claim for medical reimbursement despite absence of a medical card, rejecting summary adjudication.

labor other medical reimbursement medical card workman Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Babulal Mundhara v. Sanjeev Soni & Ors.

21 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:5937

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging the trial court's dismissal of procedural applications.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory orders final order

Sahiba Creations India Private Limited and Ors. v. Ms. Shelly Syal

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5955

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an interim order as infructuous since the suit was already disposed of by a decree, declining to interfere under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Section 105 CPC interim order supervisory jurisdiction

Union of India v. Sh Prakash Mani Tripathi & Ors.

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5957

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the dismissal of its revision petition on limitation grounds, holding that failure to seek condonation of delay justified the dismissal and refusing to interfere under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed limitation condonation of delay revision petition Article 227 Constitution of India

Sumant Kumar Sharma v. Jagjeet Singh

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5960
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to close the defendant's evidence due to repeated delays but granted one final opportunity subject to costs.

civil appeal_dismissed trial court discretion closing evidence delay in proceedings right to lead evidence

SAR TRANSPORT SYSTEMS PVT LTD v. M/S ROSS INTERNATIONAL

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5961

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to allow amendment of the written statement in a commercial suit, emphasizing judicial discretion and adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India Commercial Courts Act 2015

Siddharth Rao v. Asjeet Singh Lamba

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5962

The Delhi High Court set aside the order striking off the defence without notice under Order XV-A CPC and directed the trial court to issue notice and reconsider the matter afresh.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC striking off defence show cause notice tenancy dispute

Harpreet Singh Batra v. Sunita Sharma & Ors.

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5963

The Delhi High Court recalled non-bailable warrants against a company director issued by the NCDRC, directing deposit of the decretal amount and appearance before the Commission, emphasizing fairness in enforcement of consumer decrees.

consumer petition_allowed non-bailable warrants decretal amount National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission consumer dispute

Rita Rikh v. Arvind Kumar Gautam

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5964

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to initiate contempt proceedings but allowed revival of a dismissed application under Order XV-A CPC due to defendant's failure to honor rent payment assurance.

civil petition_dismissed Order XV-A CPC contempt proceedings revival of application rent payment

Chander Mohan Khandewal v. Hemant Wadhwa

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5966

The High Court allowed the petition directing the Trial Court to decide the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC after the connected suit was dismissed, lifting the embargo on such decision.

civil appeal_allowed Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC connected suits stay of proceedings

Amit Narang & Anr. v. Narendra Kanjani & Ors.

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5967

The Delhi High Court held that costs imposed by the NCDRC for non-personal appearance of suspended directors represented by counsel were unjustified without specific direction and allowed them to seek waiver of such costs.

civil other National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cost imposition personal appearance representation by counsel

Ram Lal Ahuja and Anr v. Inder Ahuja

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5969

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to dispose of the pending Order VII Rule 11 CPC application within eight weeks to prevent undue delay in a partition suit.

civil other Procedural Order VII Rule 11 CPC adjournment delay in civil suit expeditious disposal

Anisha Jain & Anr. v. RVS Dia Jewels

21 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5970

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to restore the written statement filed within the outer limit of 120 days, imposed costs for delay, and remanded the matter for further trial proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement Order VIII Rule 1 CPC outer limit delay in filing