Delhi High Court
31,024 judgments
Imran Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 34 IPC and Muslim Women Protection Rights on Marriage Act following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.
Sunita Devi & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 289 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the principle that criminal proceedings can be quashed when continuing them would be unjust or an abuse of process.
Praveen Sharma & Ors. v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.
Wasim & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioners' application under Section 91 CrPC for production of documents not in possession of the investigating agency, affirming the limits of such power.
Sarabjeet Singh v. The Commissioner of SGST, Delhi SGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a GST appellant who has paid the pre-deposit cannot be treated as a defaulter and denied fresh registration or NOC during the pendency of the appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Sh. Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, reaffirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unjust.
Rakesh Jindal & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under various IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties, relying on the Supreme Court's precedent permitting quashing of criminal proceedings to secure ends of justice.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. M/S Interweave Fashions (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Insurance Surveyor's report is not binding on consumer fora and refused to interfere under Article 227 with the consumer commission's order awarding full fire insurance claim and compensation.
Amit v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with a transfer order of a government employee despite his wife's medical condition, reaffirming that transfer decisions are administrative and not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or arbitrariness.
Amit Kumar Yadav v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Amit Kumar Yadav in a serious kidnapping and robbery case, emphasizing presumption of innocence, doubtful evidence, and humanitarian grounds.
Pardeep Pradhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a former police officer accused of kidnapping and robbery under Section 364A IPC, emphasizing the need to prove essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt and considering humanitarian grounds.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Jawahar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony and lack of evidence for house trespass and criminal intimidation.
M/S SERVOTECH POWER SYSTEMS LIMITED v. VIVEK SINGHAL
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw the appeal filed by M/s Servotech Power Systems Limited and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn, vacating any interim orders.
E. R. Squibb and Sons, LLC & Ors. v. Zydus Lifesciences Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining Zydus Lifesciences from commercializing a biosimilar of Nivolumab, holding the suit patent valid and prima facie infringed.
Aman Yadav alias Gaurav & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's power to prevent abuse of process of law.
Pankaj Pandey @ Ashutosh Pandey v. State of (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process.
Avinash Suri & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Col Rajesh Singh Gaur & Anr. v. Nityanand Gautam & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted the defendants one final opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff witness in a possession suit, subject to costs, despite their defence being struck off and the plaintiff's evidence closed.
Pramod Kumar v. State N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a truck driver for rash and negligent driving causing death but reduced his sentence to the period already served, granting leniency as a first-time offender.
Vikram Singh v. State Through Subhash Place Police Station
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case involving disputed financial transactions and documentary evidence, emphasizing the need to prevent undue harassment in absence of clear incriminating evidence.