Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
M/S K & CO v. M/S PAAM PHARMACEUTICALS (DELHI) LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging acquittal under Section 138 NI Act where the complainant failed to lead evidence despite multiple opportunities and did not challenge the order closing evidence.
X v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the chargesheet and de-novo investigation in a rape case, holding that no further investigation was warranted as the FIR was registered and trial was underway.
M/S Ravinder Singh & Sons v. M/S Evergreen Publications (India) Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining publication of ICSE Class-X question papers, holding that verbatim reproduction without transformative contribution infringes copyright.
Rajpal Singh v. Avleen Kaur @ Neetu
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s maintenance order reducing the wife’s interim maintenance, emphasizing the assessment of true income and the entitlement of a spouse unable to maintain herself despite earning capacity.
M/S Serving Humanity v. Arun Arora & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petitions as withdrawn on the petitioners' application and cancelled the scheduled hearing date.
Bobby v. State; Kamal v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case involving simple injuries and offences under Sections 452, 308, 506, and 34 IPC, subject to conditions including cooperation with the investigation.
M/S GOOD ONE TRADERS PVT LTD v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
The Delhi High Court held that DGFT cannot retrospectively restrict FPS export benefits and that polyester fabrics fall within eligible technical textiles, directing refund of recovered duty credit scrips.
Dipesh Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a speaking order on the petitioner’s grievance regarding allotment of a smaller plot within eight weeks.
Divyaverma v. SI Amit Dutt
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 120, 34, and 174A IPC after the complainant received full settlement, imposing costs on the petitioners to compensate the State.
Parul v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition for police protection in a familial dispute after the parties reconciled and the petitioner withdrew fear of coercion.
Navdeep Verma v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 323, and 34 IPC and related proceedings following an amicable settlement and divorce decree between the estranged couple.
Megha Kaur & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs registered under various IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties, imposing costs to prevent misuse of the legal process.
Kanwal Nain Singh Mokh v. Rekha Khurana
The High Court dismissed the petitions and related applications as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request to withdraw them.
Vinay Kumar Aggarwal v. Radha Rani Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree based on the defendant's prior judicial admission of the plaintiff's ownership and justified invoking Order XII Rule 6 CPC to close trial due to delays.
Santosh Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment and murder case where the deceased died of Aluminium Phosphide poisoning, holding that the evidence indicated probable suicide and the injuries could have been caused during treatment.
MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAO MOHSIN & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside compensation awarded under the Employees Compensation Act due to lack of credible evidence of employment and accident, and jurisdictional defects.
Charanjit Singh v. Chandrashekher Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a restraint order on property cannot be imposed or modified without proper application and sufficient grounds, vacating an unauthorized restraint on the Rohini property while upholding the existing restraint on the Roshanara property.
M/S M P Industries v. Shri Dinesh Banerjee
The Delhi High Court allowed the employer's appeal, setting aside compensation awarded for alleged occupational respiratory disease due to lack of evidence proving causation and validity of the claim.
Veena Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid or deposited in court before the Act's commencement, and directed compensation be paid under the 2013 Act.
Raj Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court modified the sentence of a petitioner convicted under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC to the period already served, considering his remorse, conduct, and family hardship, without disturbing the conviction.