Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Subash Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted Subash Gupta and co-accused in a triple murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove conspiracy and complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
M/S DEEPAK ENTERPRISES v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to refund of Terminal Excise Duty paid on supplies to 100% EOUs under the Foreign Trade Policy prior to its amendment, and that retrospective denial of such refund was impermissible.
Deepak Khosla and Ors. v. Vikram Bakshi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and restoration of an appeal under the Arbitration Act, holding that an alleged nullity must be challenged within the statutory limitation period and that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for an 805-day delay.
Suman Kumar v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent Public Sector Enterprise to decide the petitioner’s pending representation for additional transport subsidy allowance for differently-abled employees within a stipulated time, emphasizing procedural compliance without granting immediate relief.
Ashok Kumar Sawhney v. Central Bank of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld pension deduction under Regulation 33 but allowed retrospective leave encashment benefits to a compulsorily retired bank officer, overruling delay objections based on binding precedent.
Prabhu Dayal Public School and Anr. v. N R Verma and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a removal from service penalty due to procedural defects in disciplinary proceedings but allowed a fresh inquiry into alleged misconduct by teachers agitating for pay benefits.
Rati Ram v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court as prescribed, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
Rajinder Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid or deposited in court before the Act's commencement, directing payment of compensation under the new Act.
Nikhil Sharma & Ors. v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition relating to All India Services recruitment, directing the petitioners to seek remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Leelawati (Dead) Thr. Bhoop Singh & Anr v. Uday Pratap Singh Vice Chairman D.D.A. (Delhi Development Authority) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the DDA's statement on land encroachment due to petitioners' failure to prove possession with sufficient evidence.
Sh Pyare Lal Kataria & Ors v. The State of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under IPC and SC/ST Act based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Trilok and Others v. Lt. Governor Raj Bhawan, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
Inderjit Badhwar v. M/S Tara Press & India Research Press
The Delhi High Court held that a typographical error in an arbitration clause does not invalidate it and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate ongoing royalty disputes, rejecting limitation objections at the appointment stage.
Union of India v. BS Sangwan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an arbitral award granting payment for additional watch and ward services ordered orally, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.
Airport Authority of India v. V. Vardharajan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that reinstated workmen not gainfully employed are entitled to full wages during pendency of proceedings under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, and the employer must prove adequate remuneration to deny such payment.
RIEHEN INFOSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Riehen Infosolutions Private Limited against NDMC, referring to a detailed judgment in a related case for the substantive reasoning.
Mohan Lal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee’s entitlement to Second ACP benefits vests on completion of qualifying service and cannot be denied due to subsequent refusal to attend a pre-promotional course.
Jitender Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an open recruitment advertisement for Watchmen posts but directed the employer to consider long-serving ancillary workers' representations regarding promotion and salary anomalies.
HABITAT INDIA v. M/S G R GUPTA BROTHERS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Plaintiff's recovery suit based on an unrebutted project manager's certificate, modified the interest rate awarded, and held that evidence cannot be ignored solely due to lack of formal authorization.
Kela Devi & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to the landowner nor deposited in court, and thus declared the acquisition of petitioners' land lapsed due to non-payment of compensation.