Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Jagdish Prasad Shukla v. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the appointment of a common arbitrator on grounds of alleged non-disclosure and ineligibility under the Fifth Schedule, holding such challenges are premature and must be raised post-award.
Neeta Aggarwal v. Shashi Jindal
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for filing cross objections begins from the date of service of the memorandum of appeal, not from the respondent's appearance, and condoned delay in filing cross objections accordingly.
Subhash Chandra Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging disciplinary orders and belated appeals/revision petitions for being barred by unexplained delay and laches under the CISF Act.
JAIN RICELAND PVT LTD v. SAGAR OVERSEAS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and decreed the suit by recording the parties' settlement restraining the respondent from using the trademark 'SWAAD', setting aside the impugned interim order.
Ramesh Chander Goel v. Daya Kishan Goel
The Delhi High Court set aside an order admitting non-compliant affidavit evidence, directed strict adherence to court orders on document admissibility, and encouraged mediation in a family business dispute.
Madhur Jain v. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the appointment of a common arbitrator in multiple related VAT disputes, holding that challenges under the Fifth Schedule must be raised post-award and that such batch arbitrations do not attract disqualification.
Adhyapak Shakti Manch v. Govt of N.C.T. Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Government of NCT of Delhi to grant the minimum pay of Rs.17,140 as on 1st January 2006 to all trained graduate teachers appointed before that date, enforcing binding orders of the Tribunal and Supreme Court.
Mulanur Renewable Energy Private Limited v. Regen Powertech Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a party invoking an irrevocable bank guarantee is not required to give prior notice unless contractually stipulated, setting aside interim orders mandating such notice.
Mulanur Renewable Energy Private Limited v. Regen Powertech Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside interim orders requiring prior notice before invocation of bank guarantees, holding that such notice is not mandated by contract or law.
Mahindra Kumar Rohatgi v. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to an arbitrator’s appointment based on justifiable doubts under the Fifth Schedule must be decided by the arbitral tribunal first and dismissed petitions seeking substitution of a common arbitrator appointed in multiple related VAT disputes.
Mulanur Renewable Energy Private Limited v. Regen Powertech Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a party is not required to issue prior notice before invoking an unconditional bank guarantee unless contractually stipulated, setting aside orders that mandated such notice.
The Kangra Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Seema Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the disciplinary enquiry against the employee was unfair as the management failed to prove it through an independent witness, leading to dismissal of the petition challenging the enquiry's invalidation.
Kamal Kumar Jain & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation is paid or deposited in court.
Rinku Das v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondent, holding that bail orders require compelling reasons for interference and court observations without evidence should not prejudice the trial.
Saigal Holdings (P) Ltd & Anr. v. Asa Nand Khurana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow amendment of the plaint after trial commencement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to include new allegations and reliefs, dismissing the petition challenging the amendment.
Ran Singh v. Lilu Ram Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court set aside an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, granting leave to defend where triable issues arose from alleged misrepresentation and agreements indicating transfer of property.
Pawan Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a mentally incapacitated minor, relying on the victim's mother's testimony corroborated by medical and DNA evidence despite the victim's inability to testify.
Nancy Gill v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail and quashing petitions, holding that the FIR under Section 420 IPC discloses a cognizable offence and warrants investigation.
Nancy Gill v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail and quashing petitions in a cheating case where the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence supported by prima facie evidence.
Dharam Pal v. Chairman Cum Managing Director Air India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a de novo departmental inquiry against an employee already exonerated on the same charge violates the principle of double jeopardy and is impermissible under Air India Employees' Service Regulations.