Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
M/S H. G. RETAIL SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. JOGINDER SANSANWAL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against a decree for possession and arrears of rent, upheld the landlord's claim for mesne profits, and ordered release of the deposited decretal amount due to the tenant's absconding and non-prosecution.
Ferrero Spa & Anr. v. Piyush Devangan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Ferrero against defendants manufacturing and selling chocolates infringing its registered trademark and well-known trade dress of FERRERO ROCHER.
Azhar Ahmed v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to the landowner nor deposited in court, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
B. D. Joshi v. Land Acquisition Collector/A.D.M. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken within five years, and persons interested including power-of-attorney holders have locus standi to claim such lapse.
Sunanda Devi Saraf v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession is taken and compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court.
Nathi Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not tendered or deposited in court as required, and mere deposit in government treasury does not amount to payment.
S. Daya Singh & Sons HUF v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither tendered nor paid in court and possession not taken, declaring the petitioners' land acquisition lapsed accordingly.
Ashok Kumar & Anr. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court within five years, declaring the petitioners' acquisition proceedings lapsed accordingly.
Garima Goel v. Pankaj Jain
The High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed written statement to the amended counter-claim, emphasizing the trial court’s duty to ensure complete pleadings and fair opportunity despite procedural neglect.
Batra Hospital Employees Union v. Batra Hospital & Medical Research Centre
The Court held that the Payment of Bonus Act applies to institutions with a profit motive despite charitable status, affirmed the Union's locus standi, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.
Komansu Electronics Pvt Ltd v. M/S Gadsec Solutions & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a defence of stolen cheque was plausible but improbable and directed the defendants to deposit the entire claimed amount as a condition for leave to defend a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC.
Balraj Tahim & Anr v. Kaushalya Tahim & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs' amendment application to add pleas asserting joint Hindu family ownership of properties, emphasizing that amendments should be permitted to ensure justice and proper adjudication without being barred by limitation or statutory provisions at the pleading stage.
Sunita Gangwal v. Chottey Lal
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for possession in favor of the owner, rejecting the daughter-in-law's claim to residence under the Domestic Violence Act after she had left the matrimonial home.
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited v. Neeraj Gulati
The Delhi High Court upheld that an auction purchaser of property on an "as is where is" basis is not liable to pay outstanding electricity dues of the previous owner as a condition for grant of a new electricity connection.
Rajiv Katyal v. Arun Kumar Paswan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the landlord's petition, holding that mere dispatch of a demand notice without proof of service or non-return is insufficient to sustain an eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Virender Kumar Awasthi v. Mahender Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's condition requiring the defendant to deposit earnest money in court as a prerequisite to contest a summary suit involving disputed property title.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Hargyan Singh & Ors.
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeal in a motor accident claim by recalculating compensation based on minimum wages and Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and damages.
Airports Authority Officers Association (India) v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Airports Authority of India must recognize the petitioner association for the full two-year period as mandated by its own policy and cannot truncate the recognition period arbitrarily.
Paras White Gold Agro Industries v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking exemption of vehicles carrying edible oils from Environment Compensation Charge, holding that the Government's notifications limiting exemptions must be followed.
Rajinder & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a minor altercation between neighbors following amicable settlement, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile and contrary to justice.