Avek Raj & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 28 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:6153
Ravinder Dudeja
CRL.M.C. 4953/2025
2025:DHC:6153
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A), 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's power to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unjust.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4953/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 28.07.2025
CRL.M.C. 4953/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21514/2025 EXEMPTION
AVEK RAJ & ORS ......Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Deepak Ghai, Mr. Radhey Shyam, Mr. Rishabh Khari & Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Advs. along
WITH
petitioners in person
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .… Respondents
Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP
WITH
Insp. Yadram Yadav, PS Najafagarh & SI Loveleen, PS Moti Nagar.
Mr. Hariom Arora, Adv. for R- 2 along
WITH
R-2 in person.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 432/2017, dated 03.12.2017,registered at P.S Moti Nagar, Delhi under Sections 354(A)/506/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. As per averments made in the FIR, on 30.11.2017, Respondent No. 2 alleged that she was called to 16/25 Moti Nagar, petitioners verbally abused, physically assaulted, and threatened to kill her upon her refusal to pay money. She further alleged that petitioners restrained and molested her. Subsequently, FIR No. 432/2017, dated 03.12.2017 was registered at instance of Respondent No. 2 at P.S Moti Nagar, Delhi under section 354(A)/506/34 IPC. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 341/354/354(A)/506/509/34 IPC against the petitioners.

3. During the course of proceedings, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and Respondent No. 2 has placed on record her no objection certificate/Affidavit dated 22.07.2025 in support of the same.

4. Both parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Loveleen, from PS Moti Nagar.

5. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has no objection if the FIR No. 432/2017 is quashed against the petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 432/2017 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 432/2017, dated 03.12.2017, registered at P.S Moti Nagar, Delhi under section 354(A)/506/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.

9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR NO. 432/2017, dated 03.12.2017, registered at P.S Moti Nagar, Delhi under section 354(A)/506/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed, subject to petitioners depositing cost of Rs. 5,000/- each with Delhi Legal Services Authority within a period of one month.

10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JULY 28, 2025