Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

DCKAPIL v. BSESRAJDHANI POWER LTD.

01 Jun 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:8738

The Delhi High Court recorded a mutually agreed Settlement Agreement, modified the impugned order accordingly, and disposed of the writ petition based on the parties' out-of-court settlement.

civil petition_allowed Settlement Agreement Out-of-court settlement Writ petition Compensation

The Officer Commanding v. Ram Mwas Yadav

01 Jun 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:8733

The High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed by the petitioner but left open the question of law raised.

other petition_dismissed petition not pressed question of law left open disposal of petition High Court of Delhi

The Commissioner of Income Tax v. General Electric Power Systems Inc

01 Jun 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · (2015) 373 ITR 65 (Delhi)

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the ITAT's order disallowing interest under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following a prior binding decision, subject to the Supreme Court's final ruling.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 234-B Income Tax Act, 1961 interest on default of advance tax coordinate bench decision

Anurag Sanghi & Anr v. Knitpro International

01 Jun 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3723

The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte injunction restraining appellants from manufacturing knitting needles infringing the respondent's registered designs and trademarks, affirming the binding effect of the Settlement Agreement and the scope of intellectual property protection.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Settlement Agreement Designs Act, 2000 Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 Interlocutory injunction

Anurag Sanghi & Anr v. Knitpro International

01 Jun 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3722

The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte injunction restraining appellants from manufacturing knitting needles infringing respondent's registered designs and trademarks, enforcing the terms of a prior Settlement Agreement.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Settlement Agreement Designs Act, 2000 Interlocutory injunction Passing-off

Anurag Sanghi & Anr v. Knitpro International

01 Jun 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3721

The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte injunction restraining appellants from infringing the respondent's registered designs and trademarks in knitting needles, affirming the binding effect of the Settlement Agreement and the distinctiveness of design rights.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant interlocutory injunction design infringement passing-off Settlement Agreement

Anil Kakkar & Ors. v. Hans Raj Kakkar & Anr.

01 Jun 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3726

The Delhi High Court set aside probate granted on a Will as the probate petition was barred by the three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and limitation can be raised for the first time on appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probate limitation Limitation Act 1963 Article 137

Ram Avtar Jakhar v. Chaudhary Avadesh Kumar

01 Jun 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3724

The Delhi High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a subsequent Section 9 petition under the Arbitration Act as the Madras High Court was first seized, leading to setting aside the Delhi Court's order protecting the respondent's tenure as President of the Volleyball Federation of India.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 42 jurisdiction

Saroj Kumar Jha v. Commissioner Workmens Compensation & Ors.

01 Jun 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:3725-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging non-payment of wages and statutory provisions, holding that private employment disputes with disputed facts are not maintainable under Article 226.

labor petition_dismissed Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Article 226 writ petition maintainability private employment dispute

Virendra Singh v. Managing Committee Haryana Shakti Sr Secondary School & Ors

01 Jun 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3718-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified that withdrawal of an appeal based on the Directorate of Education's assurance does not decide merits, and aggrieved parties remain free to challenge the order legally.

civil petition_dismissed Letters Patent Appeal Review Petition Withdrawal of appeal Directorate of Education

P K v. P

01 Jun 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3719-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against an interim maintenance order directing him to pay Rs.10,000 per month for the minor child, holding that the minimal maintenance amount was justified despite income disparity.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 minor child maintenance income apportionment

Shiv Singh & Ors. v. Union of India

01 Jun 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3720

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the deceased's family, holding that the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died in a railway accident and that the Railways failed to prove absence of a valid ticket.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 Section 123 bona fide passenger railway accident compensation

Deepak v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

01 Jun 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:3717

The Delhi High Court declined anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of rape, administering drugs without consent, and circulating obscene material, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation in serious offences.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC rape Section 376 IPC

M/S S REDDY INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

01 Jun 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:3716

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that Sections 64 and 65 of the Indian Contract Act do not entitle a party to recover expenditure unless the other party received a benefit under the void or voidable contract.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 64 Section 65

Girish B S & Anr. v. JK Technosoft Limited

01 Jun 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:3715-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal by recording a mediated settlement between parties involving compensation, apology, and withdrawal of criminal proceedings, emphasizing enforceability of court-recorded settlements.

commercial appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act 2015 Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Non-Disclosure Agreement

Larsen & Toubro Limited v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

01 Jun 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3713

The Delhi High Court dismissed the challenge to the arbitral award under Section 34 and ordered enforcement with return of bank guarantee after six weeks.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Enforcement Bank Guarantee

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. Larsen & Toubro Limited

01 Jun 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3714
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting extension of time to the contractor due to contributory delays by the owner, rejecting the owner's claim for price discount for delay under the contract.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Extension of time Price discount Contract interpretation

TMD Friction India Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

01 Jun 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:3706

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of TMD Friction India Private Limited after full compliance with the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate petition_allowed voluntary winding up Companies Act 1956 Declaration of Solvency Official Liquidator

Nipun Malhotra v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

01 Jun 2018 · The Acting Chief Justice; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:3705-DB

The Delhi High Court prohibited the acquisition of standard floor buses by the Government, affirming the constitutional and statutory rights of persons with disabilities to accessible public transport and mandating their involvement in related policy decisions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant persons with disabilities accessible public transport low floor buses Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016