Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
M/S Bhasin Infotech & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Naresh Kumar Dua
The Delhi High Court held that directors of a company cannot be held personally liable for contracts entered into solely by the company, setting aside the decree against them while upholding the decree against the company.
Sunita Arora & Ors. v. Shashi Bala
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of registered documents transferring property rights, ruling that such bilateral contracts cannot be unilaterally revoked, thereby dismissing the plaintiff's appeal for partition of the second floor and terrace.
Kamla Sharma v. Rahul Gupta
The Delhi High Court set aside the order granting leave to defend in an eviction petition, holding that the tenant failed to raise a prima facie defence on bona fide requirement grounds, and allowed eviction in favour of the landlord.
Kamla Sharma v. Pawan Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition against the tenant's leave to defend application and ordered eviction with six months' delayed execution under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Versus
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition setting aside the leave to defend granted to the tenant and passed an eviction order with six months' delayed execution.
Phool Kanwar v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the authority to decide the petitioner's pending application to set aside a 1980 ex parte ejectment order within twelve weeks, considering the delay and merits.
ICICI Home Finance Co Ltd v. Manoj Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of loan amount with interest against defaulting borrowers and held that the property seller cannot claim interest without cancelling allotment and refunding amounts as per agreement.
Bhagyanagar India Ltd v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed BSNL to pay outstanding amounts to Bhagyanagar India Ltd. strictly as per the decree and specified 2009 circulars, rejecting reliance on subsequent circulars for higher penalties.
Madan Mohan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the Tribunal's rejection of his review application, holding that a review cannot substitute for a fresh petition to challenge a separate office order.
Barkha Ram v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a government employee from allotted premises for unauthorized subletting, affirming the limited scope of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 in eviction proceedings under the PP Act.
Delhi Jal Board v. Rajora Builders
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for payment claims under a contract begins from the date of preparation of the final bill by the employer, not the date of work completion, and upheld the arbitral award in favor of Rajora Builders.
M/S. R K IMPEX v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the DRI cannot freeze a bank account without statutory authority and initiated proceedings, setting aside the impugned freezing order against M/s R K Impex.
Narender Kumar Gupta v. Anita Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 1513-day delay in filing, holding that unexplained and gross delay without sufficient medical proof does not justify condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Charan Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of the petitioner’s application for alternate plot allotment and directed the respondent to reconsider it after verifying submitted documents.
Baleshwar Sharma v. Nageshwar Pandey
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for interim relief restraining sale of disputed land post-registration of Sale Deed and referred the parties to arbitration as per the arbitration clause in the MOU.
Baleshwar Sharma v. Nageshwar Pandey
The Delhi High Court held that a sale deed is effective from its execution date despite later registration, dismissed interim relief restraining transfer, and referred parties to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Jigyasa Jain & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking EWS reservation benefits in JEE Advanced 2019, holding that failure to update category within prescribed timelines despite adequate public notice disentitles candidates from claiming such benefits.
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA v. AMIT VOHRA
The court set aside the dismissal of a complaint case in default due to counsel's engagement elsewhere and proof of process fee payment, restoring and remanding the case for trial.
Sanjay Rathee v. Commissioner (Sports), DDA and Ors
The High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal as per the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and Supreme Court precedent.
Gurudev v. Director of Education
The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition, which was accordingly treated as withdrawn by the Delhi High Court.