Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
R K Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that under the RTI Act, disciplinary action under Section 20 can be recommended only against the CPIO and not against the first Appellate Authority.
Mool Singh & Anr. v. Lt Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking allotment of disputed land held by the Municipal Corporation, directing authorities to consider the appellant's claim in accordance with prior orders while the ownership dispute remains unresolved.
Kavita v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the allotment of retail outlets based on the date of issuance of the Letter of Intent, dismissing the appeal challenging administrative delays affecting seniority.
Krishna Bhoj & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners accused under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC, holding that no substantive allegations warranted their arrest and they must cooperate with investigation.
Mohd. Shahid v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a scrap business dispute case involving simple injuries and counterblast FIRs, subject to bail conditions.
Chhutka & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from family disputes following an amicable settlement and relinquishment of property rights, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Dinesh Dass v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder under Section 302 IPC due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Citigroup Inc & Anr v. Citicorp Business & Finance Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held the defendants guilty of contempt for violating injunctions against trademark infringement, directed striking off their companies, and enforced compliance through attachment and domain transfer orders.
Educare Limited & Anr. v. S. K. Sachdev & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to allow addition of witnesses after cross-examination to prevent abuse of process, permitting only one inadvertent omission with strict conditions to ensure timely completion of evidence.
Jai Bhagwan and Anr. v. Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of petitioners' application for alternate plot allotment due to alleged non-submission of documents, directing reconsideration after compliance and cost payment.
Jeetender Sharma and Anr. v. Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of petitioners' application for alternate plot allotment due to document non-compliance, directing reconsideration upon payment of costs and submission of required documents.
Kasturi v. Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of an application for alternate land allotment due to non-submission of documents, directing reconsideration after allowing the petitioner to cure deficiencies and imposing costs.
Shanti Devi v. Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of petitioner’s application for alternate plot allotment for non-submission of documents and directed reconsideration after allowing time to furnish deficiencies and imposing costs.
Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax, Delhi (East) v. Ashutosh Metal Industries
The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT's decision dismissing the Revenue's duty demand for clandestine removal due to insufficient and uncorroborated evidence primarily derived from a third party.
Chhutka & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from intra-family disputes following an amicable settlement through mediation, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh. Chunni Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
Sh. Manoj Yadav & Ors v. State (Govt. N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Rajeev Sharma & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and full payment of compensation between the parties.
Ganesh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 307 IPC based on a compromise between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed, emphasizing the court's power to prevent futile criminal proceedings.
Devender Singh v. M/S Malik Buildcon Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted specific performance of an oral, unregistered Agreement to Sell immovable property where the purchaser had paid most of the price and time was not the essence of the contract.