Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Umed Singh v. Election Commission of India

13 May 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:3962
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission cannot accept nomination papers from persons claiming to represent a registered unrecognized political party with unresolved internal disputes, and such disputes must be resolved by civil courts, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the ECI's refusal.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Election Commission of India registered unrecognized political party internal disputes office bearers

Shovendra Jha v. Director General CRPF

13 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3872-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging compulsory retirement imposed on a CRPF personnel for indiscipline, citing inordinate delay and upheld the disciplinary penalty under Section 11(1) of the CRPF Act, 1949.

administrative petition_dismissed compulsory retirement disciplinary proceedings CRPF Act 1949 Section 11(1)

NHPC Ltd v. APAAR Infratech Pvt Ltd

13 May 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:4104

The Delhi High Court set aside the interest portion of an arbitral award contrary to contract terms but upheld the principal and damages for wrongful contract termination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Interest on disputed amount Clause 55 of GCC Pre-Contract Integrity Pact

M/S BLOOMING ORCHID v. FP LIFE EDUCATION FOUNDATION

13 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4151

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator, holding that the limitation period excludes bona fide settlement negotiations and the petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was within time.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition limitation Notice of Invocation

Nishant Arora @ Noni v. Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, GNCTD & Anr.

13 May 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:4075
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an externment order under Section 47 of the Delhi Police Act, ruling that the authority’s subjective satisfaction based on objective material justified the order, and limited judicial review precludes interference absent illegality or procedural impropriety.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant externment order Delhi Police Act, 1978 Section 47 DP Act habitual offender

Shiv Lal Doda v. Pernord Ricard India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

13 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4290-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against rejection of a plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC, holding that alleged inconsistencies in a surety bond do not warrant dismissal at the preliminary stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action surety bond rejection of plaint

M/S Satnam and Company v. ICICI Bank Limited

13 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4289-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against plaint rejection for non-compliance with pre-litigation mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, reviving the suit with liberty to withdraw and file afresh complying with mediation requirements.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 12A Commercial Courts Act 2015 Order VII Rule 11 CPC pre-litigation mediation plaint rejection

Sanjay Kumar v. University of Delhi

13 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a direct recruitment advertisement, holding that promotion was not possible due to lack of eligible departmental candidates as per Recruitment Rules, 2008.

administrative petition_dismissed Recruitment Rules 2008 Promotion Direct Recruitment Limited Departmental Examination

Nikhil Sehgal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

13 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4150

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for grant of Probate of the last Will of Late Shri Tejinder Chawla, confirming its valid execution and excluding a non-owned property from the estate.

civil petition_allowed Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 valid execution of Will attesting witnesses

Sandeep Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4195

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Yogesh and Ors. v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4184

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing prevention of abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Vipin and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4199

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/365/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 308 IPC

Sangeeta Mulwani; Jyoti Pardasani v. Kavita Keswani

13 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3988

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to declare a Will genuine, which is exclusively within the Probate Court's domain under the Indian Succession Act, and accordingly dismissed the suit seeking such declaration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will Indian Succession Act, 1925 Civil court jurisdiction Probate

Sanjay Kumar v. Hans Raj College

13 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4017

The Delhi High Court quashed recovery notices issued after seven years for alleged excess payments during study leave, applying the Supreme Court's five-year limitation rule in Rafiq Masih.

administrative petition_allowed Significant recovery of excess payment study leave Comptroller and Auditor General report Rafiq Masih judgment

Vicky and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3882

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Group 4 Securities Guarding Ltd. v. Secy. Labour, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

13 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4057

The Delhi High Court held that bonus must be computed strictly as per the Payment of Bonus Act's definition of salary or wages, excluding allowances like house rent allowance, and quashed the Industrial Tribunal's award directing computation based on minimum wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 2(21) Minimum Wages Act, 1948 bonus computation

Rekha and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

13 May 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:3958

The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Jal Board to pay enhanced compensation of Rs. 30 lakhs to families of deceased manual scavengers in line with Supreme Court mandates prohibiting manual scavenging and mandating rehabilitation.

labor petition_allowed Significant manual scavenging compensation enhancement Delhi Jal Board forced labour

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Maharaji Education Trust

13 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4938-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that reassessment under Section 148 was valid based on prima facie material, and that charging capitation fees disqualifies a charitable trust from exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 reassessment capitation fee charitable trust exemption

Shikha Chakravarty & Ors. v. Major Saumitra Sarkar (Retd.)

13 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5922

The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition enforcing conditional repair obligations and lift access under a settlement agreement, directing compliance by the respondent upon requests from the petitioners.

civil other Settlement Agreement Execution Petition Clause 11 Repairs Clause 12 Lift Access

Delhi Development Authority v. Rajender Singh

13 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1418-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's unreasoned order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration to ensure a reasoned decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal order setting aside remand lack of reasoning