Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Prashant Tomar & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon the petitioners' counsel's request.
MCDONALDS INDIA PVT LTD v. CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that denial of intervention in arbitration proceedings does not prejudice a party's rights in separate civil injunction proceedings, which must be decided on their own merits.
LK v. State of Delhi NCT & Anr.
The High Court set aside the Special Court's premature finding that the prosecutrix was major, holding that age determination must follow prescribed juvenile justice procedures and be decided at trial after hearing the victim.
Prateek Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking police investigation direction after revision remedy was exhausted, affirming that second revisional scrutiny is barred under Section 397(3) Cr.P.C. absent special circumstances.
Abhishek Gupta v. National Stock Exchange of India Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions against the National Stock Exchange due to petitioners' non-appearance and the disbursement of claimed amounts rendering the petitions infructuous.
DELHI ANUSUCHIT JATI VIKAS SANGTHAN v. DEPARTMENT FOR THE WELFARE OF SC/ST/OBC/MINORITIES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking additional facilities and increased booking charges for a community centre after management was lawfully transferred to DUSIB, allowing revival only if the petitioner succeeds in challenging the transfer order.
Hindalco Industries Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging environmental protection orders under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 are barred by the availability of an alternate remedy before the National Green Tribunal and granted a temporary stay to enable the petitioner to approach the NGT.
Ambience Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ambience Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. challenging the Commissioner of Income Tax's order, holding that no jurisdictional error or illegality was shown.
Smt. Swarn Kapoor & Anr v. Shri Manpreet Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court declared the plaintiff as the lawful owner of the disputed property and cancelled forged documents fabricated by defendants claiming ownership.
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr v. M/S Arora Sationers and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to amend their written statement to include subsequent design registration after suit filing, holding such amendments permissible under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC even after trial commencement if bona fide and necessary.
Mahinder Lal Kapoor v. Rajeshwari
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell, holding that the plaintiff proved readiness and willingness to pay the balance sale consideration despite trial court's contrary finding.
Dr. S.K. Bansal v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld ONGC's order deeming the petitioner to have resigned due to unauthorized absence under Regulation 14(5) after due process and opportunity of hearing were provided.
D.T.C. v. Ved Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's rejection of approval for dismissal of an employee due to lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing limited writ jurisdiction to reappraise facts.
Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy v. Gautam Tank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the interim injunction was revived upon restoration of the suit but refused interim relief under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC due to appellant's delay, directing procedural safeguards and dismissing the appeal.
Technical Executive Officers Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking pay parity for Motor Vehicle Department officers in Delhi with their counterparts in other States, holding that similarity in duties and conditions of service is essential for such claims and that judicial review cannot substitute administrative decision-making.
Vikas Bakshi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of alleged unauthorized constructions due to unverified information and imposed a restriction requiring prior leave for future PILs by the petitioner.
Annabelle Analista Malibago v. DRI
The High Court acquitted the appellant under the NDPS Act, holding that the investigation was vitiated because the Investigating Officer was also the complainant, violating the constitutional right to a fair trial as established in Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab.
G.P. Rural Development Youth Progress Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking restoration of a community centre and cancellation of its lease to NCC due to petitioners' non-appearance and respondent's satisfactory explanation of administrative decisions.
Nathi Ram v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a bus conductor for misconduct after a fair domestic inquiry, holding that non-production of passenger witnesses does not vitiate the inquiry and the punishment was proportionate.
Central Park Estates Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Lancor Holdings Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by accepting the defendant's consent to suffer decree and payment, granting relief to the plaintiffs accordingly.