Full Text
Translation output
'' vf- i9 '' i- $-66 to 68 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.p.rc) 468n/2nis ^ CM No. tS0l?/7ni « ABHISHEK GUPTA .....Petitioner-
Through: None.
W.p.rc) 468n/2nis ^ CM No. tS0l?/7ni « ABHISHEK GUPTA .....Petitioner-
Through: None.
VERSUS
NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. d j .
Respondents
Through: Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for NSEI/R-1.
Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil PChanna, Advocates for
R-2.
Respondents
Through: Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for NSEI/R-1.
Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil PChanna, Advocates for
R-2.
WITH
W.P.(C) 469V2018 & CM No isn^7/->nt« SHASHANK GUPTA
VERSUS
NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED ANDORS. p , Respondents
Through: Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for NSEI/R-1.
Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil Khanna, Advocates for
R-2.
AND
W.p.rc) 47nn/20i8 & cm nq. isin.viois MADHU GUPTA
2018:DHC:8821
Through: Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for NSEI/R-1.
Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil Khanna, Advocates for
R-2.
AND
W.p.rc) 47nn/20i8 & cm nq. isin.viois MADHU GUPTA
2018:DHC:8821
VERSUS
NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. Respondents
Through; Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil Khanna, Advocates for
R-2.
Through; Mr Ashish Prasad, Ms Mukta Dutta and Mr Sahil Khanna, Advocates for
R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
25.10.2018
25.10.2018
ORDER
1. These petitions were passed over as none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. None appears for the petitioners on the second round as well. It is noticed that none had appeared for the petitioners on the previous hearing (held on 22.10.2018) as well.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents further states that the petitions have become infructuous as the amounts have already been disbursed.
3. The petitions are dismissed in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents as well as in default.
4. The pending applications are also disposed of VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 25, 2018 MK