Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Qayyum Khan v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

08 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6763

The High Court held that marking documents as exhibits during cross-examination does not prove them and refused to de-exhibit them, allowing the petitioner to challenge their proof later.

civil petition_dismissed exhibit proof of documents cross-examination de-exhibition

Minakshi Singh; Annu Singh; Ashutosh Bharti v. Niranjan Kumar

08 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6650-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order reinstating a Postal Assistant whose termination for alleged concealment of an FIR was found unjustified as he was unaware of the FIR at the time of declaration and was acquitted in the criminal trial.

administrative appeal_dismissed Attestation Form FIR concealment Termination of service Central Administrative Tribunal

Dev Verma v. State and Anr

08 Aug 2025 · Arun Monga · 2025:DHC:7778

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR against Dev Verma, holding that prima facie material connecting him to stolen jewellery requires trial and cannot be summarily dismissed.

criminal petition_dismissed FIR quashing theft stolen jewellery Section 411 IPC

Bharath Natarajan v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6625-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to condone delay in filing a recruitment-related application, holding that delay without sufficient cause disentitles relief.

administrative petition_dismissed condonation of delay Central Administrative Tribunal recruitment process Offer of Appointment

Santosh Kumar Sahu v. Union of India

08 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425

The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions and upheld that PBORs are entitled to condonation of shortfall in qualifying service and pro-rata pension, rejecting retrospective application of a later circular denying such benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pro-rata pension condonation of shortfall Persons Below Officer Rank Article 14

Court on its Own Motion v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:6694-DB

The Delhi High Court monitored and directed the GNCTD to expedite healthcare infrastructure completion and medical staff recruitment, ensuring effective implementation of health schemes under judicial supervision.

administrative other healthcare infrastructure hospital construction medical recruitment public health schemes

India Steel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:6690-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the reasoned GST demand order, directed the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit, and deferred the challenge to notifications extending adjudication deadlines pending Supreme Court's decision.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Section 168A CGST Act Show Cause Notice GST Notifications

Ganpati Polymers v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax

08 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:6698-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST orders on fraudulent ITC availment due to non-participation and upheld the validity of the order passed within limitation, while allowing time to file statutory appeal.

tax petition_dismissed Input Tax Credit fraudulent availment GST portal Show Cause Notice

Diwakar Pandey & Ors. v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:6693-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to complete the CISF cadre review within four months, ensuring promotional avenues per UPSC and DoP&T guidelines, and dismissed the review petition challenging these directions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant cadre review promotional stagnation CISF Inspector Executive

Dipankar Ghosh v. Union of India

08 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6692-DB

The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies at the correct stage and disposed of the petition accordingly.

constitutional other writ petition withdrawal leave to withdraw liberty to seek remedies

Lac Virender Choudhary v. Union of India

08 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6691-DB

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the case accordingly.

other other Procedural writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Sompal v. Union of India and Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6682-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking directions on a representation already rejected, granting liberty to challenge the rejection order in due course.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition mandamus representation injury on duty

Mukesh Puri v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

08 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6704

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act, rejecting the appellant's alibi and false implication claims based on credible child victim testimony and corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child sexual abuse alibi defence child witness credibility

Satya Dev Bharal v. Krishn Dev Bharal & Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:6597-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of Probate of a Will after finding due execution, attestation, and sound mind of the Testator, dismissing challenges based on forgery, undue influence, and registration irregularities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Will execution Attestation

Satya Pal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:6608-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the compulsory retirement penalty imposed on a government servant convicted under IPC sections 406 and 498A, holding it disproportionate given his benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act and directed his reinstatement with service benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement Probation of Offenders Act disproportionate punishment judicial review

CCS Computers Private Limited v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

08 Aug 2025 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2025:DHC:6606

The Delhi High Court upheld NDMC’s two-year blacklisting of CCS Computers Pvt. Ltd. for submission of forged bid documents by its employees, affirming employer’s vicarious liability and the validity of blacklisting under General Financial Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant blacklisting vicarious liability forgery tender process

Bhupinder Kumar Malik v. Union of India & Anr

08 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:6630-DB

The Delhi High Court held that service rendered on deputation in an analogous post counts for seniority and promotion after absorption, directing fixation of seniority from 1995 for the petitioner absorbed into the JAG cadre.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant deputation absorption seniority analogous posts

Suresh Kumar v. Union Bank of India

08 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7607
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding that the petitioner was not a continuous employee and dismissed his claim of illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor petition_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship continuous service Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25B(2)(a)(ii)

Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI and Ors.

08 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:6617-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction and legality of a Summary Security Force Court trial convicting a BSF personnel with psychiatric illness for outraging modesty, dismissing his challenge to the trial and punishment.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Summary Security Force Court Border Security Force Act, 1968 Section 354 IPC psychiatric fitness for trial

Priyank Sukhija v. State of NCT of Delhi & Divya Mehta

08 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6675

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine mutual settlement and divorce by mutual consent, emphasizing the binding nature of settlement terms and the independent rights of minor children.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC mutual consent divorce settlement agreement