Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, CRL.M.C. 5446/2025 & CRL.M.A. 23381/2025
ASHISH GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ram Aktar Sharma, Mr. Priyank Basoya, Mr. Mohit Sharma, Ms. Astha Singh and
Ms. Garima, Advocates.
Petitioners in person.
Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State
Respondent No. 2 in person.
JUDGMENT
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 202/2024, dated 20.04.2024, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.
2. The Marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 solemnized on 10.02.2023 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Due to temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 have started living separately since 09.10.2023. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. She further submits that petitioners coerced her to undergo abortion. Subsequently, FIR No. 202/2024 was lodged at instance of Respondent No. 2 under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners.
3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement Deed dated 07.03.2025 at Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi. In view of the aforesaid settlement, Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 have dissolved their marriage by mutual consent on 02.06.2025. It is submitted that Petitioner No. 1 has paid the total settlement amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five lacs only), three gold rings and two anklets (silver) as per the schedule in settlement. Copy of the Settlement Deed dated 07.03.2025 has been annexed as Annexure P-3.
4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Sohan Lal, from PS Tigri.
5. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has no objection if the FIR No. 202/2024 is quashed against the Petitioners.
6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 202/2024 is quashed.
7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-
8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 202/2024, dated 20.04.2024, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.
9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR NO. 202/2024, dated 20.04.2024, registered at P.S Tigri, Delhi under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.
10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J August 11, 2025