Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
R.K. Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the MACP scheme is part of the pay structure and must be effective from 01.01.2006 as per the Cabinet decision, directing grant of second financial upgradation from that date.
Abbott Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Competition Commission's order directing investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is a preparatory administrative measure not requiring a detailed prima facie inquiry before investigation.
Sudesh Chhikara v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that relatives of senior citizens sought to be evicted have the statutory right to appeal under Rule 22(3)(4) of the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009, and set aside the order rejecting such appeal as not maintainable.
Nitin Aggarwal v. Praveen Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's refusal to grant leave to defend a suit based on a dishonored cheque, holding the defence to be frivolous and not raising triable issues.
Sushila Gopalan & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court held that subsequent testamentary cases should not proceed when probate petitions with evidence substantially recorded are pending, emphasizing prevention of multiplicity of proceedings and allowing parties to participate fully in the probate petitions.
Rajinder Pal Singh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a Section 138 NI Act offence post-conviction based on a mediated settlement, acquitting the petitioner and directing release of deposited amounts with appropriate cost remission.
Pramod Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a robbery case where investigation was complete and evidence against him was limited to co-accused statements and CCTV footage.
Hemant Tyagi v. UCO Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier order granting refund of bond money, holding that writ petitions for refund are maintainable and limitation is not a ground for review.
Jai Prakash v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from armed robbery under Sections 393/398 IPC to robbery under Section 392 IPC due to insufficient evidence of firearm use and reduced the sentence accordingly.
M/S HOME CARE SERVICE v. M/S WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator with parties' consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, disposing of the arbitration petition accordingly.
Bharat Rail Automations Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the respondents' limitation objection and directing costs against them for failure to file a reply.
M/S. POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED v. M/S. G.E.T. POWER LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon the petition of Powergrid Corporation due to the respondent's non-response and existence of a valid arbitration agreement.
Manjeet Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the husband accused under multiple IPC sections arising from matrimonial discord, subject to conditions preventing interference with investigation or contacting the complainant.
Amravati Bhaskar v. State; Satish Bhaskar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under various IPC sections, holding that their cooperation with investigation and evidence of false implication justified bail.
Amravati Bhaskar v. State; Satish Bhaskar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of assault and misbehavior, considering counter-allegations and cooperation with investigation.
Banwarilalji Agarwal & Ors. v. State
Anticipatory bail granted to petitioners in a commercial dispute involving allegations of forgery and cheating, subject to cooperation with ongoing investigation.
M/S. CAPTAIN GUMAN SINGH & SONS v. M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court held that a sole proprietorship dealership agreement terminates upon the proprietor's death and the corporation lawfully terminated the dealership as the petitioners lacked authorization to continue without a fresh agreement.
K A Nagamani v. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the NCDRC lacks jurisdiction under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act to entertain Revision Petitions against State Commission orders passed in enforcement proceedings, as such orders do not constitute consumer disputes.
Deep Singh v. The Institute of Cost Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant was not entitled to exemption from a CMA examination paper after exhausting the maximum allowed exemptions under duly notified amended regulations and had not validly applied for exemption.
Baljinder Singh v. Sadhu Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a property dispute, holding that delay and laches barred relief and that execution court must adjudicate title disputes under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC.