Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
State (N.C.T of Delhi) v. Gaurav Goswami
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a POCSO case, holding that inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and the rebuttable nature of statutory presumption warranted upholding the trial court's judgment.
Manisha Bhati v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the petitioner's consideration in the under 56 kg category for CRPF recruitment, upholding a prior binding judgment that she was ineligible for the under 52 kg category.
Shri Shiv Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court again if aggrieved.
Union of India & Anr. v. Sgt Narendra Pal Singh Elect/Fit (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
India Retails and Hospitality Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 101 Zone 9 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice due to SCNs being uploaded on an obscure portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing.
Harish Kumar v. Yatender Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing the written statement filed via e-filing within the permissible outer limit to be taken on record, imposing costs for belated filing and setting aside the trial court's order striking off the defense.
M/S HI TECH CONSTRUCATIONS ENGINEERS & BUILDERS v. M/S KUBER BUILDER (A UNIT OF KUBER GROUP)
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking restoration of execution petitions and condonation of over seven years' delay, holding that mere ignorance of case transfer and blaming counsel do not constitute sufficient cause.
Sumit v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 308 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served, considering the nature of injury and appellant's circumstances.
SRSC Infra Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed the uncommunicated and unreasoned debarment order and consequent withdrawal of the contract award, emphasizing the necessity of natural justice and reasoned decisions in public procurement debarments.
Ravinder @ Kalu v. The State NCT of Delhi; Raghunath @ Chhotu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court deferred final decision on sexual offence convictions pending further evidence to conclusively determine the prosecutrix's age, emphasizing strict compliance with juvenile justice provisions for proving minority.
TPF Engineering Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the automatic debarment of a petitioner as an allied firm of a debarred entity under MoRTH guidelines, holding that such debarment does not violate natural justice where opportunity of hearing is provided.
Nirmal Gupta v. Ram Niwas Gupta
The High Court set aside the civil imprisonment order against the judgment debtor on his undertaking to pay the decretal amount in installments within a fixed timeframe, with no further extensions allowed.
Pravesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a serious property fraud case involving forged documents, holding that his central role in the conspiracy and strong prima facie evidence justified continued custody.
Chhote Lal v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of central involvement in a property fraud conspiracy involving forged documents and prior evasion of arrest.
Chirag Sharma & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust.
Sukhjit Singh & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and full and final compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Subhash & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of settlement between parties and discontinuance of prosecution by the complainant.
Shubham Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to an accused ATM operator alleged to have stolen Rs. 7.41 lakh, relying on physical and documentary evidence and rejecting unsubstantiated claims of prior resignation.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 260/2022 involving offences under Sections 323, 354(B), 379, 509, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise between parties, subject to payment of costs.
Mr. Amit Choudhary; Ms. Akansha Mehra v. SHARP CORP LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a complaint under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that defects in the Board Resolution authorizing prosecution do not warrant quashing and are matters for trial court determination.