Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Abhishek Nanda v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dispute case following an amicable settlement through mediation, subject to compliance with settlement terms and conditions.
Whatman International Limited v. P Mehta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against Defendants for repeated infringement and passing off of the WHATMAN trademark, holding them guilty of contempt for disobeying court orders and making false statements.
Sunil v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and seven-year sentence of Sunil for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC based on overwhelming and corroborative evidence.
Dr. Ankita Baidya v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that maternity leave availed by a DM student at AIIMS cannot justify postponement of her final examination, upholding her right to appear in the exam as per the original schedule.
Gurdeep Singh & Ors. v. Parkash Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a final partition decree for ignoring the unresolved dispute over the deceased co-owner's share, directing further adjudication before final division.
Preetilata Jain v. Kailash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite the pending criminal trial under Sections 406 and 498A IPC and complete it within one year to ensure timely justice.
Major (Retd) Saurabh Priya Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/323/324/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Pranati Swain v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC on the ground of bona fide error and settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ashu Khan v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that FIRs involving serious offences like rape cannot be quashed on the basis of settlement, emphasizing public interest and ordering trial continuation.
Mohd. Javed Saifi & Ors. v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of a bona fide compromise between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Hukum Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sandeep Wali & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sachin Sharma & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Islam & Ors. v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under multiple IPC sections on the ground of settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Pramod Kumar v. State
Pre-arrest bail granted to petitioner in rape case where prosecutrix's statement excluded him and delay in FIR was explained, subject to bail bond and cooperation with investigation.
Multi Impression Carbons Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and final dissolution of Multi Impression Carbons Private Ltd after finding full compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
Indian Medical Association (Regd.) v. M/S. Arth Business News Channel Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that an unregistered lease exceeding one year is deemed month-to-month tenancy and allowed recovery of arrears, mesne profits, and interest from defaulting tenant.
Earthcon Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Mahamaya Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a consent arbitration award and termination order, holding that the petitioner failed to prosecute with due diligence and good faith and was not entitled to exclusion of delay under the Limitation Act.
Yogesh Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a CTET question as out of syllabus, holding that courts should exercise restraint in interfering with final answer keys unless there is a manifest error.
Bijender Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, holding that delay and laches bar revival of stale claims and possession is deemed with the acquiring authority as per Supreme Court orders.