Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd v. DDA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner's claims for escalation and loss of profit due to lack of evidence and belated notice, affirming that claims under Section 73 of the Contract Act require proof and timely demand even without an escalation clause.
Surinder Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Naim Ahmed v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a cheating and forgery case, making interim protection absolute subject to bail bond and surety conditions.
Pawan Shah & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354B, 509, 34 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act after the victim and complainant settled the dispute and the prosecutrix did not support the prosecution.
Ahmad Hussain & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Union of India v. Gagandeep Singh
The Delhi High Court held that interim orders by the PMLA Appellate Tribunal must be reasoned and refused to interfere with a stay order lacking such reasons, emphasizing procedural safeguards in appellate proceedings.
Raj Kumar & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Ashok & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to recall and cross-examine material witnesses despite prior dismissal, imposing costs for procedural negligence to ensure a fair trial.
IFCI LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court declined to quash an FIR at the preliminary investigation stage and directed that notice be given before coercive action against company directors or employees.
Rajesh Kumar Pandey v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s belated applications for further investigation in a long-pending cheating trial, holding that no further investigation is warranted at the final stage to prevent delay.
Rajesh Kumar Pandey v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s applications for further investigation at the final stage of a long-pending cheating trial, holding that such applications are not warranted and may be abused to delay justice.
Ajay Kumar & Ors v. State of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on a mediated settlement, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in non-serious criminal disputes.
Bhuvnesh Prakash Sharma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s revision petition directing the trial court to summon key defense witnesses to prevent prejudice and ensure a fair trial.
BKFC & Company Engineers & Contractor v. Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding the claims barred by limitation and confirming that claims beyond the arbitration agreement are not arbitrable.
Mahesh Kumar v. Motor Licensing Officer and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suspension of a driving licence without furnishing offence details and without a show cause notice violates Section 19(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after due procedure.
Union of India v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court remitted the case for reconsideration of a police constable appointment application in light of the Supreme Court's Avtar Singh ruling on disclosure of criminal antecedents and acquittal.
Saleem & Ors v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw their criminal petitions after referring to relevant Supreme Court precedents, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD Petitioner Through Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advs with Ms.Somya Suman, Asstt.Legal Manager. v. RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the time for the Arbitrator to render the award by four months upon the parties' request, allowing arbitration proceedings to conclude beyond the original deadline.
Sh. Nigam Chaudhary v. State
The High Court dismissed two criminal miscellaneous petitions as withdrawn after the petitioners, informed of a binding Supreme Court precedent, chose not to pursue them further.
Gold Field Shiksha Sanstha & Anr. v. Dr. Ajay Kumar Thakral
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions as withdrawn, directed the Trial Court to examine petitioner No. 2 and expedite proceedings, and reduced the costs imposed on petitioners.