Delhi High Court

48,028 judgments

Year:

TATA Chemicals Ltd. v. PURO WELLNESS PVT. LTD.

15 Mar 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:1587

Delhi High Court held that TATA Chemicals Ltd. is entitled to injunctive relief against Puro Wellness Pvt. Ltd.'s disparaging advertisements, rejecting forum shopping objections and affirming protection of brand goodwill under civil law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant disparagement advertising standards forum shopping injunction

Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools v. Directorate of Education

15 Mar 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:1585

The Delhi High Court upheld the DoE's authority to require prior approval for fee hikes in private unaided schools on government land with a 'land clause', validating the selective withdrawal of interim fee hike orders and balancing school autonomy with regulatory oversight.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 private unaided recognized schools fee hike 7th Central Pay Commission

Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools v. Directorate of Education

15 Mar 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:1586

The Delhi High Court held that private unaided recognized schools on government land with a 'land clause' have autonomy to fix fees without prior approval subject to filing statements, and struck down the DoE's selective withdrawal of interim fee hike permissions as arbitrary and unlawful.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 private unaided recognized schools fee hike 7th Central Pay Commission

Sanjay Verma v. Gopal Halwai

15 Mar 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:1583

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the petitioner failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt and the respondent successfully rebutted the statutory presumption of liability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 118 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonor Rebuttal of presumption

Ajeet Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

15 Mar 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:1584

The High Court held that framing charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC requires specific evidence of dowry-related harassment and cannot be based solely on the statutory presumption arising from unnatural death within seven years of marriage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 304-B IPC dowry death statutory presumption

Horlicks Ltd & Anr. v. Heinz India Pvt Ltd

15 Mar 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:1582-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a learned Single Judge may consider a modified advertisement without formal amendment of pleadings for interim injunction purposes if the Plaintiffs have notice and opportunity to respond, and the modified advertisement falls within the scope of the prayers.

civil other Significant interim injunction modified advertisement pleadings amendment comparative advertising

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Deccan Healthcare Ltd.

15 Mar 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:1613

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and token damages to Alkem Laboratories against Deccan Healthcare for trademark infringement of GEMCAL under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC due to the defendant's failure to file a written statement and deceptive similarity of marks.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off trade dress Order 8 Rule 10 CPC

Sandeep Silas v. CBI & Ors.

15 Mar 2019 · Rekha Palli, J · 2019:DHC:1581
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Sanctioning Authority’s prosecution sanction under Section 19 of the PC Act is not bound by the CVC’s advice or DoPT OMs and can be judicially reviewed pre-trial only for manifest failure of justice, dismissing petitions challenging the sanction order.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act Central Vigilance Commission Section 19 PC Act

S. Daljit Singh v. Director of Gurdwara Elections and Ors.

15 Mar 2019 · Yogesh Khanna · 2019:DHC:1608

The Delhi High Court held that the Director of Gurdwara Elections is empowered to call election meetings upon the Executive Board's mass resignation, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the election notice as lacking locus and merit.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1971 Director Gurdwara Elections Lieutenant Governor Executive Board resignation

Holy-Land Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. P.S. Trading Co. & Ors.

15 Mar 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:1605

The Delhi High Court dismissed the trademark infringement suit against retailers without the actual infringer, emphasizing that multiple suits for the same infringement are impermissible and that claims must be properly pleaded.

civil petition_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off retailer liability actual infringer

Vipin Mittal & Ors. v. State & Ors.

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1604

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Bhim Sen & Ors. v. The State & Anr

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1603

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Paramjeet & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1602

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Dharmender Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1601

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 323, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC as clarified in Parbatbhai Aahir.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement inherent jurisdiction

Akhand Pratap Singh v. CBI

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1600

The High Court held that a maintainability plea under Section 6 of the DSPE Act, once rejected at the charge stage and upheld by the Supreme Court, cannot be raised again during evidence but may be raised at final arguments.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 6 DSPE Act maintainability of trial discontinuance of trial charge stage

Meera Goyal v. State, NCT of Delhi

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1599

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings for cheating, holding the dispute to be civil in nature without dishonest intention, emphasizing caution in converting contractual breaches into criminal offences.

criminal petition_allowed Significant cheating Section 420 IPC breach of contract criminal proceedings

Meera Goyal v. State, NCT of Delhi

15 Mar 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:1598

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings for cheating against Meera Goyal and Ashok Kumar, holding the dispute to be a civil matter lacking criminal intent.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant cheating Section 420 IPC breach of contract criminal proceedings

Food Corporation of India v. ITC Limited

15 Mar 2019 · THE CHIEF JUSTICE; V. KAMESWAR RAO · 2019:DHC:1597-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Food Corporation of India's review petition challenging the recording of submissions in an earlier order, holding that the issue was already considered and answered.

other petition_dismissed review petition maintainability recording of submissions Food Corporation of India

S P D v. K D

15 Mar 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:1614-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting enhanced maintenance to the unemployed wife and minor child, ruling that actual earning, not mere capability, governs maintenance entitlement under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act capability to earn actual earning

Unique Infoways Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. M/s MPS Telecom Private Limited

14 Mar 2019 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:7445
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of accused directors and company for dishonour of multiple cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the petition challenging the trial's maintainability and liability of directors.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Stop payment instruction