Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Sharda Devi & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Court held that cashiering alone does not justify withholding pension without a separate forfeiture order but allowed the respondents liberty to proceed under the CCS Pension Rules for pension forfeiture.
M/S BHAGIRATI ENTERPRISES AND ANR v. M/S KIRTI ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a written statement filed beyond the 120-day statutory limit under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act cannot be admitted, and a party is bound by its earlier sworn admissions before the trial court.
Rishi Enterprises v. Additional Commissioner Central Tax Delhi North & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a consolidated GST order issued within limitation by email service in a fraudulent ITC availment case and dismissed the writ petition, permitting appeal on merits.
Shanti Udyog Weldsafe Pvt Ltd and Ors. v. Mallcom India Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal as withdrawn after the parties settled the underlying dispute and the settlement was decreed.
Sehrawat v. Ashok Mudgal
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's unreasoned order granting higher ACP benefits and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with directions for expeditious disposal.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Agrawal & Anr.
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing pay refixation of a senior employee at par with his junior, rejecting limitation and option non-exercise defenses.
M/S. MINDRAY MEDICAL INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S. VISION RAY HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 appointment stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator despite objections on impartiality.
Rudra Developers and Contractors v. H. S. Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving merits to the arbitral tribunal.
Anand Rathi Global Finance Limited v. Amar Greengrass Healthcare and Diagnostics Private Limited
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits.
Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable for contracting a second marriage during the subsistence of the first, holding that Rule 18 of the CISF Rules applies post-appointment and a Hindu marriage cannot be dissolved by a mere social deed.
S v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault and criminal intimidation case, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and unreliability of the prosecutrix's testimony.
Meena Chawla v. Income Tax Officer Ward 61 (1) Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging reassessment orders under the Income Tax Act, holding that efficacious alternative remedies before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) must be availed before invoking writ jurisdiction.
MS Preeti & Anr. v. Ankit Bhardwaj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court’s rejection of compensation in a motor accident claim, holding that death was caused by the vehicle accident based on preponderance of probability and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.
Ravi Prakash v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of employees promoted on ad hoc basis before recruitment rule amendments to regularization against existing vacancies, directing a review promotion process with consequential benefits.
M/S Tushar Products v. Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North
The Delhi High Court held that a single Show Cause Notice covering multiple financial years is permissible under the CGST Act, 2017 in cases of fraudulent Input Tax Credit claims and dismissed the petition challenging such consolidated proceedings.
Samsher Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging disqualification from CRPF recruitment due to LASIK surgery, holding that participation with knowledge of eligibility criteria bars subsequent challenge absent statutory or constitutional violation.
Jasminder Pal Singh v. Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court held that at the charge framing stage, documents not relied upon by the prosecution cannot be summoned under Section 91 Cr.P.C., dismissing the petition seeking production of certain letters by the Enforcement Directorate.
Manish Goel HUF v. The Commissioner Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without a specific Show Cause Notice proposing such cancellation and a reasoned order, setting aside the retrospective cancellation and directing fresh adjudication.
M/S SHREE SHYAM POLYMERS v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, CGST, DELHI NORTH
The Delhi High Court held that consolidated Show Cause Notices and orders for multiple financial years are valid under the CGST Act in cases of fraudulent Input Tax Credit availment, dismissing the petition and allowing the petitioner to file an appeal.
Suman v. Bharati College
The Delhi High Court held that a waitlisted candidate has no indefeasible right to appointment once selected candidates have joined, and vacancies arising thereafter require a fresh recruitment process.