Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
The Management of Delhi Transport Corporation v. Vimla Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the justified removal of a workman for prolonged unauthorized absence, denied pension benefits to his widow due to incomplete service, but awarded her compensation and directed payment of gratuity and provident fund.
A v. Mail Today Newspapers
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, granting liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation if legally permissible.
Union of India v. Maj. Gen. S.C. Mofianty
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petitions and directed prompt compliance with the Armed Forces Tribunal's order to conduct a Special Selection Board applying the old promotion policy for certain Major Generals.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 v. ITOCHU INDIA PRIVATE LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that arm's length price under the transactional net margin method must be computed solely with reference to the assessee's own costs, dismissing the Revenue's appeals challenging this principle.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4 v. Agilis Information Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by both Revenue and Assessee against the ITAT order on transfer pricing adjustments, holding that selection of comparables does not raise a substantial question of law absent perversity.
Ajit Singh Rana v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of anticipatory bail applications by petitioners cooperating with investigation and directed them to seek regular bail after charge-sheet filing.
Bhargava Motors v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the GST authorities to allow refiling or manual filing of TRAN-1 forms to rectify technical glitches preventing input tax credit claims under the CGST Act.
Ravi Raj v. Sh. Simarpreet Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition, compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after settlement and payment of the cheque amount, and acquitted the petitioner subject to payment of legal costs in installments.
S. Surjeet Singh v. State
Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner in property-related fraud case after investigation concluded his role, without commenting on merits.
Shadab Raza v. C.P Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend to tenants in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that triable issues regarding bona fide need and availability of other accommodation warranted a full trial.
Keshav Bansal v. National Testing Agency and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate who appeared in a qualifying Class XII subject for the first time in 2019 is eligible to appear in JEE Advanced 2019 despite earlier passing other subjects, interpreting eligibility criteria purposively to allow the petitioner’s participation.
Gulshan Kumar Juyal v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that DIAL is liable to pay 12% monthly interest on delayed compensation payments to trolley retriever workers as directed by the Supreme Court, modifying the earlier dismissal of the writ petition.
Chander Kant Beri & Anr v. Ravi Kant Beri & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for declaration and partition is not maintainable when substantially identical issues are pending in an earlier suit between parties or parties with undisassociable interests, emphasizing judicial economy and leaving benami property issues to be adjudicated in the earlier suit.
JVG Finance Ltd & Ors. v. Golden Gate Industries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the winding up petition against Golden Gate Industries Ltd. on just and equitable grounds, holding it liable for inter-corporate deposits and mismanagement prejudicial to shareholders.
Nitin Sehrawat v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging denial of examination permission due to insufficient attendance, holding that Article 14 does not entitle a student to benefits not conferred by valid university ordinances even if others were irregularly permitted.
UPSRTC v. Ashok Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant’s liability for full compensation in a motor accident claim, rejected contributory negligence, but reduced the interest rate on the award from 12% to 9% per annum.
Vinay Chhabra v. Judge Chawla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a consent decree, holding that such decrees are binding and not appealable under Section 96(3) CPC, and the proper remedy is to challenge the validity of the compromise before the same court.
Rohtash v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a police constable candidate's application due to lingering doubts about his involvement in a rape case despite his acquittal by the trial court.
Rajiv Bhasin v. Centre for Development of Telematics (C-DOT) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against an employee cannot be conducted by an authority against whom the employee has made allegations, directing such proceedings to be conducted by the Central Vigilance Commission and ensuring payment of subsistence allowance during suspension.
Mahesh Rai v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for acid attack murder, affirmed the admissibility of the dying declaration recorded by police, and enhanced the sentence to reflect the gravity of the offence.