Delhi High Court
46,428 judgments
Tusharkaushik v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the bail application and dismissed the bail application as withdrawn.
Mannu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of Mannu for murder under Section 302 IPC based on reliable ocular and medical evidence despite minor contradictions and the interested status of witnesses.
D. K. Chopra v. Registrar General Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court Rules mandating English as the language of pleadings are constitutionally valid under Article 348, and pleadings in Hindi are not permissible in the Delhi High Court.
Priyanka Sinha & Anr v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction to fill vacant postgraduate medical seats at GGSIPU from the All India NEET merit list, holding that Supreme Court orders permitting such filling in Uttar Pradesh do not apply generally and no legal right exists for such relief without MCI's consent.
Giesecke & Devrient MS India Pvt. Ltd. v. Oriental Bank of Commerce
The Delhi High Court held that the bank was entitled to annul a tender before contract execution and vacated an interim injunction restraining issuance of a fresh tender with revised specifications.
Suresh Kumar v. Shardha Ahuja
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to refuse further oral arguments after closing evidence and final opportunities, dismissing the petition challenging this order under Article 227.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Raj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the recovery of salary paid pursuant to a set-aside award but disallowed interest on recovery from a retired employee, emphasizing protection of public funds without unjust enrichment.
MS. PUSHP LATA SHARMA v. THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pay upgradation, holding that the petitioner cannot claim parity with a junior employee who exercised a beneficial pay fixation option, especially after superannuation.
PEC Retired Employees Welfare Association v. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi High Court held that PECL cannot deny medical reimbursement benefits to retired employees who have paid lifetime contributions under its voluntary Medical Scheme despite financial losses.
Ved Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the Lt. Governor's revisional power to enhance the petitioner's penalty from compulsory retirement to removal from service under DDA regulations despite the six-month limitation applicable to appellate authorities.
Dr. Rachna Khanna Singh v. Santosh S.P. Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a wife from property owned by her mother-in-law, holding that the property was not a shared household under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and that a licensee’s right to reside ceases upon termination of license.
Seema alias Prabha v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the life convictions of Seema and Kishore Kumar for the murder of Saurabh based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, admissible recoveries, and failure of the accused to explain incriminating facts.
Parveen Chauhan v. State
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant's sentence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, considering his clean antecedents and prolonged trial, applying the proviso to Section 25(1B) to grant leniency.
Tej Kumar @ Tinku v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a minor under Section 377 IPC and POCSO Act, ruling that delay in victim's statement and absence of injury do not vitiate the prosecution case.
Jatin Dhawan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement and the complainant's affidavit, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Munna Lal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 354, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, reaffirming the scope of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Ravi & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 308, 341, and 34 IPC on the ground of settlement and cleared misunderstanding between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Nitin Yadav & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Sarabjeet Salarya & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, relying on its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Madhucom Projects Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that a policy circular restricting tender participation based on pending project milestones does not amount to blacklisting without due process and bound the authority to its prior statement allowing the petitioner to participate in future tenders.