Delhi High Court
46,428 judgments
Surinder Kumar Aggarwal v. Moti Gupta Jagdish Kumar Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a settlement recorded by authorized counsels in an execution petition and directed auction of judgment debtors' property for non-payment of the agreed sum.
Rakesh Mehra v. UOI & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging disciplinary removal of an employee found guilty of embezzling pension funds based on clear documentary evidence and proper enquiry.
Umesh Kumar Arora & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Deepak Yadav v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 356 and 379 IPC on the ground of settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Mohit Kathuria & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Manoj Sagwan & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Ashok Choudhary v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act based on a 'No Dues Certificate' and settled dispute, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for offences with predominant civil elements.
Nittin Johari v. SFIO
The Delhi High Court denied interim bail to a fraud accused for performing funeral rites but allowed limited custodial movement for specific ceremonies at the accused’s expense.
Prashant Bhartiya v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that serious offences like rape cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise due to overriding public interest.
Savita @ Sakshi v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the trial court must allow summoning of a relevant witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. even after prosecution evidence closure if necessary for a just decision.
Ritika Juneja v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to transfer the trial from the original court due to the trial court's efforts to compel compromise without consent, emphasizing that justice must be seen to be done.
Sunita Kumari & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Anganwari Workers who accepted contractual supervisor posts without resigning their original honorary posts are entitled to continue as Anganwari Workers after termination of their contractual engagement.
STCI Finance Ltd v. Cedar Infonet Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to comply with Supreme Court-imposed conditions for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC entitles the plaintiff to a decree for recovery of loan amount with interest.
SHRI K.C.GHUMARIA v. UOI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the 2006 Guidelines mandating consideration of all anticipated vacancies in a financial year remain binding and directed the respondents to complete the selection process for the fourth CBDT Member vacancy expeditiously, quashing the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's claim.
Beejakshree Varman v. M/S Worlds Window Impex India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court quashed complaints and summoning orders against a resigned Director under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that specific allegations of responsibility are necessary to impose liability.
State v. Anil Narang & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that charges under Sections 406/34 and 498A/406/34 IPC should be framed against the respondents as the allegations prima facie made out a case, modifying the trial court's discharge order.
R.K. Naidu v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's challenge to disciplinary charges, holding that audit reports do not bar independent disciplinary proceedings for alleged misconduct.
Amarjeet Singh Bammi v. Sukhmani Kaur
The Delhi High Court remanded the suit for permanent injunction to the trial court to decide the interim injunction application on merits after allowing the respondent to file reply, emphasizing that interim relief similar to final relief can be granted only in rare cases where withholding it causes irreparable injury.
Deepak Khosla v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing continuation of stem cell therapy pending licensing under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, to protect the petitioner's health.
Shikha v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court permitted continuation of Embryonic Stem Cell therapy as an interim relief pending regulatory licensing under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 to prevent serious health prejudice to patients.