Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Santosh Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by applying appropriate deductions for dependency and future prospects, while upholding insurer liability and interest.
Orris Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent FIR based on the same allegations as an earlier FIR is impermissible and directed it to be clubbed with the ongoing investigation, restraining coercive action against the petitioner.
MS Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India v. MS Abhipra Capital Limited & Ors.
Delhi courts have territorial jurisdiction over a suit for refund of stock exchange membership fees where the petitioner has a regional office and part of the cause of action arose in Delhi.
Sunita Devi & Ors. v. Satish Kumar Chaudhary & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal due to failure of the claimants to prove the involvement of the offending vehicle and unreliability of the key eyewitness testimony.
Rahul Kaul v. Manoj Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including full salary components and increasing non-pecuniary damages, while reducing interest rate to 7.5% per annum.
Yashpal v. Rakesh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct multiplier, factoring future prospects, and upholding disability assessment, directing payment with interest.
Yasin Malik v. Lok Pal Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by considering future income prospects and reasonable non-pecuniary damages while upholding the Tribunal's disability assessment.
Vishnu Gopal Vashisht v. DDA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ challenging DDA’s rejection of alternative allotment for unauthorized occupation of public land, affirming strict adherence to policy eligibility and public interest in ecological preservation.
Lakshmi Murdeshwar Puri v. Saket Gokhale & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that defamatory tweets questioning the plaintiff's financial propriety without due verification constituted actionable defamation, granting injunctions, apology, and damages.
Riyaz Malik @ Riyazuddin v. The State N.C.T of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner due to serious criminal antecedents and grave threats despite co-accused being granted bail earlier under less serious charges.
PROMAC ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD v. CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable completion of arbitration proceedings.
Suman Gupta v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief directing continuation of LPG supplies to the petitioner distributor pending inquiry, holding that suspension without notice and hearing violates natural justice under the applicable Marketing Discipline Guidelines 2022.
Mudit Gupta & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed further investigation against petitioners in a fraud FIR registered without departmental approval, held the arrest illegal under Section 41(A) CrPC, and granted bail to the accused pending further proceedings.
Kajal Kiran Mishra v. M/S Radiant Hues CRM Solution Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration under DIAC and refused impleadment of non-parties in the arbitration.
Pushpa Khanna & Anr. v. Sanjay Narang & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed reopening of evidence in an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that sub-letting to a subsequent tenant is covered by general pleadings and delay in producing evidence can be excused if discovered late due to circumstances beyond the party's control.
Ram Kishan v. M/S Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed Section 65B certificate for electronic evidence during ongoing trial proceedings, holding that non-filing is a curable procedural defect and technicalities should not impede justice.
Harjit Singh Sahni v. Sidhant Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant who voluntarily surrenders possession after an agreed extended period cannot seek restoration under Section 19(2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Primordial Systems Pvt. Ltd v. Raman Kumar Chug & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's partial rejection of belated documents under Order VII Rule 14 CPC due to lack of satisfactory explanation for delay and petitioner’s conduct.
Union of India v. ANS Construction Ltd
The Delhi High Court partly set aside an arbitral award by rejecting compensation for idling of resources due to lack of evidence, while upholding other claims including price escalation and delay attribution to the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Link Engineers (P) Limited v. M/S Asia Brown Boveri Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery under an alleged agreement, holding that liabilities transferred in a demerger and no valid joint venture existed with defendant No. 1, thus no enforceable contract or entitlement to payment arose.