Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Harsh Dhanuka HUF v. Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax & Ors.

03 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4940-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITSC’s addition of undisclosed commission and margin money in off-market transactions, affirming the ITSC’s plenary jurisdiction under Chapter XIX-A to pass settlement orders beyond disclosed income when supported by credible evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission Chapter XIX-A Section 245D(4) off-market transactions

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Shri Satya Prakash Gupta

03 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4939-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income tax additions for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18, holding that without incriminating material found during search, no additions can be sustained in completed assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act search and seizure incriminating material completed assessment

M/S NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd v. Oswal Woolen Mills Ltd

03 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4911-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award that a minor delay in commissioning a solar power plant due to force majeure and administrative delays did not justify forfeiture of the Performance Bank Guarantee without proof of legal injury.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Performance Bank Guarantee Liquidated Damages Force Majeure

Jyoti Chaudhary & Anr. v. Rai Virender Nagpal

03 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4941

The Delhi High Court partly allowed a petition under Article 227 to reduce the cost imposed for setting aside an ex-parte order, considering the petitioners' financial incapacity.

civil appeal_allowed ex-parte order costs written statement Section 151 CPC

M/S GTL Infrastructure Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

03 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4937

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to waive costs imposed by the MCD Appellate Tribunal due to counsel's non-appearance caused by a genuine medical emergency.

administrative petition_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India waiver of costs non-appearance medical emergency

Virender Kumar Bhardwaj v. Muncipal Corporation of Delhi

03 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4935

The Delhi High Court directed MCD to pay costs for belated filing of written statement, emphasizing that delay condonation must be exceptional and unjustified delay attracts costs.

civil petition_dismissed delay in filing written statement condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC costs for delay

Nirmal Bindal v. Sanjeev Agarwal

03 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4933

The Delhi High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the pending appeal expeditiously, considering the petitioner’s age and health, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural status quo expeditious disposal Appellate Tribunal senior citizen

Ambience Private Limited & Anr. v. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.

03 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4932

The Delhi High Court held that a bank cannot arbitrarily withdraw a One Time Settlement after full payment by the borrower and emphasized the binding nature of OTS sanction terms and the doctrine of legitimate expectation.

civil petition_allowed Significant One Time Settlement OTS withdrawal Non Performing Asset Legitimate Expectation

Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora & Anr.

03 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4931
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against respondent no. 1, holding that non-payment of EMIs and alleged asset disposal were not willful disobedience due to financial inability and ongoing insolvency proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court willful disobedience Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Captain Deepak Kumar v. Election Commission of India

03 Jul 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:4928-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s letters patent appeal challenging the dismissal of his writ petition containing unsubstantiated and mala fide allegations, and directed local authorities to monitor his mental health under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

constitutional appeal_dismissed writ petition unsubstantiated allegations mala fide Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

International Management Group (UK) Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, International Taxation, New Delhi

03 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4893-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that income earned by IMG not attributable to its Indian PE is taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA and Income Tax Act, rejecting IMG's challenge to bifurcation and the 'make available' test.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Fees for Technical Services India-UK DTAA Section 9(1)(vii)

Kostub Investments Ltd. v. Reinz Talbros Ltd.

03 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4902

The Delhi High Court held that claims of secured debenture holders in company liquidation must be adjudicated up to the date of appointment of the provisional liquidator, not the final winding up date, dismissing the petitioner's challenge.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 provisional liquidator final winding up secured creditor

Kamal Singh Alias Kamal Singh Rawat v. Jai Kumar Sharma & Anr.

03 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4914
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that receipt of benefits under the Employees State Insurance Act does not bar a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act for injuries caused by a third party, allowing the appeal and remanding for fresh assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Employees State Insurance Act Motor Vehicles Act Section 53 ESI Act compensation

Genesis Finance Service Co Limited v. Usha Bansal and Anr

03 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4910

The Delhi High Court dismissed a purported tenant's belated application to obstruct auction of mortgaged properties in execution of a money decree, holding such applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC are maintainable only by decree-holders or auction purchasers.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 97 CPC execution proceedings mortgage property auction tenancy claim

Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.

02 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4948

The Delhi High Court directs domain name registrars to block infringing domain names and recognizes RBI's beneficiary name lookup facility as a key enforcement tool in trademark infringement disputes involving domain names.

intellectual_property other Significant domain name infringement trademark rights domain name registrar beneficiary name lookup

NORTH EASTERN CARRYING CORPORATION LTD v. DO BEST INFOWAY

02 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4945

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 120-day limit for filing written statements in commercial suits and counter-claims, dismissing the petition seeking condonation of a one-day delay.

civil petition_dismissed Significant written statement counter-claim commercial suit 120 days limitation

NORTH EASTERN CARRYING CORPORATION LTD v. GOYAL IMPEX AND INDUSTRIES LTD

02 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4944

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 120-day limit for filing written statements in commercial suits and counter-claims, dismissing the petition seeking condonation of a one-day delay.

civil petition_dismissed Significant written statement counter-claim commercial suit time limit

NORTH EASTERN CARRYING CORPORATION LTD v. HLG TRADING

02 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4942

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 120-day limit for filing written statements in commercial suits and counter-claims, dismissing the petition seeking condonation of a one-day delay.

civil petition_dismissed Significant commercial suit written statement counter-claim mandatory timeline

Anurag Mahajan v. Tumlare Travels Private Limited

02 Jul 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4929-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside an ex parte decree due to unexplained delay and lack of sufficient cause, affirming the dismissal of applications under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Order IX Rule 13 CPC Section 5 Limitation Act ex parte judgment condonation of delay

Navneet Sharma & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

02 Jul 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4898

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act