Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
Consoritum of Sree-Meil v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted a joint petition extending the time for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award by nine months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Vivek Chaukar v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that a promise of marriage to a married woman separated but not divorced does not vitiate consent to sexual relations absent bad faith.
Ashish Bhalla v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside an order initiating proceedings for false statements under Section 340 CrPC against the appellant, holding that no unimpeachable evidence established that his denial of being part of the promoter or investor group was false.
Vinay v. State; Rahul @ Chirmanti v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery and use of deadly weapon despite non-examination of the complainant and non-production of the knife, relying on credible eyewitness and medical evidence.
Ramswaroop v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing admission under the EWS category despite delayed issuance of the certificate to a minor applicant, emphasizing that administrative delays should not prejudice eligible candidates.
Sneha Vats v. University of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a meritorious candidate wrongly marked absent during document verification is entitled to admission relief despite cut-off dates, directing consideration for the next academic session.
Parvinder Singh Gill v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Mobin Ahmad v. Gajender Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s revision petition against eviction on bonafide necessity grounds but stayed execution of the eviction order subject to the tenant’s undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and pay use and occupation charges.
Yogender Thakur v. Deepak Panchal
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction upon the tenant's undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and stayed execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Padma Arora & Ors. v. Rajesh Narula
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn on the tenant's undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and stayed the eviction order's execution accordingly.
M/S Chopra General Store & Ors. v. Assa Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction as withdrawn on the petitioners' undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Om Prakash v. Ghayasuddin
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction under bona fide necessity, allowing withdrawal subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and pay use and occupation charges, staying eviction execution accordingly.
M/S DEEPAK TEXTILE & ANR v. SANJAY GAUTAM
The Delhi High Court held that a co-owner can maintain an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act without impleading other co-owners, and dismissed the petitioners' challenge to the eviction order for lack of triable issues.
Steelcase Inc. v. Mr. K.J. Bhuta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to include earlier trademark use and additional pleadings, emphasizing liberal amendment principles under Order VI Rule 17 CPC subject to costs.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Anr. v. Sanjeev Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction and granted interim injunction restraining manufacture of a patented drug for export, holding that Section 48 of the Patents Act protects manufacture in India including for export purposes.
Arun Chopra v. Kaka-Ka Dhaba Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for trademark infringement must be stayed under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 when the plaintiff pleads prima facie tenable invalidity of the defendant's registered trademark and has filed a rectification application before the IPAB.
Virendra Sharma & Anr v. Oriental Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to include site room rent in the deceased's monthly income for loss of dependency and granted additional compensation as per Supreme Court precedents.
Tarun Sadana & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that simultaneous prosecution under IPC and IT Act for the same offence violates double jeopardy, allowing investigation under IT Act but disallowing IPC offences unless IT Act offences are not made out.
Rajan Malhotra & Anr. v. Union Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that novation of contract with new directors and surety discharged erstwhile directors and guarantors from liability on loan guarantees, setting aside the appellate tribunal's order and restoring the original tribunal's judgment.
The Statesman Limited v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Competent Authority's finding that The Statesman Limited did not suffer continuous heavy cash losses and must pay revised wages under the Majithia Wage Board Award, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the payment obligation and classification.