Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Gurvinder Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board's mechanical rejection of a life convict's premature release application for failure to consider all relevant factors and directed reconsideration in accordance with applicable policy and rules.
Chandan Yadav v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr.
The High Court held that a suit restraining electricity disconnection cannot be dismissed for non-deposit of charges when supply is not restored and the petitioner does not seek restoration.
MODI PAINTS AND VARNISH WORKS v. SANJAY GUPTA AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition for removal of the trademark 'MODI CRYL' as the trademark had ceased to subsist due to non-renewal beyond its expiry date under Section 25(3) of the Trademarks Act, 1999.
Somender Yadav v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief reinstating students removed for nonpayment of unapproved fee hikes, emphasizing the necessity of DOE approval for fee increases and protecting students' academic interests pending final adjudication.
Baby Krutika Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing a child admitted under the EWS category to continue studying despite a dispute between the school and the Directorate of Education, upholding her fundamental right to education under Article 21A.
Mukesh Khurana v. Rahul Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court held that a verbal tenancy agreement replacing an expired written lease extinguishes the original arbitration clause, and thus no valid arbitration agreement existed to refer the dispute to arbitration.
Nishesh Ranjan & Anr. v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in interdependent agreements apply collectively, directing disputes under a tripartite housing loan and sale agreement to arbitration despite the absence of an arbitration clause in the tripartite agreement.
Amit Sharma v. Sugandha Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking interim custody of his son, emphasizing the child's best interest and discomfort with the appellant, and upheld supervised visitation rights.
Deepak Sinha v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to analyze electro-homeopathic formulations, holding that recognition of new medical systems is a policy matter beyond judicial interference and the laboratory's statutory functions do not extend to such analysis.
A T Kearney Consulting India Pvt Ltd v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a consultancy agreement where parties failed to agree on the arbitrator.
Umakant Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed a Section 482 CrPC application to correct a judgment by adding the name of an advocate who appeared for the appellant but was omitted from the original judgment.
Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of non-notified parties from arbitration proceedings, holding that arbitration cannot be initiated against parties not served with mandatory Section 21 notice or included in the Section 11 petition.
Praduman Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF transfer policy guidelines are not mandatory and upheld the administrative transfer of a Head Constable despite his claim for home sector posting based on tenure and personal grounds.
Kamlesh Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CISF transfer guidelines are only broad parameters and do not confer a vested right, dismissing the petition challenging the transfer of a Head Constable to an out of home sector posting.
Ravi Setia & Anr. v. Som Nath Setia & Ors.
The High Court held that parties cannot be barred from cross-examining on documents declared null and void in a prior suit pending appeal, and objections to admissibility should be decided at final arguments.
Samiksha Chaudhary & Anr. v. Maulana Azad Medical College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of MBBS students who were denied eligibility to appear in the 3rd Professional Part II Examination due to incomplete clinical training as mandated by the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997.
Nayan India Science and Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Tushar Maurya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking a mandatory injunction directing a former employee to transfer knowledge post-termination, holding that specific performance of personal service contracts is barred under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
M/S SHIVOY ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI NORTH AND ORS
The Delhi High Court directed verification of the petitioner’s additional place of business and restoration of GST registration if found operational, emphasizing that cancellation solely for non-existence at the principal place is unjustified.
Neeraj Dengre @ Neeraj Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery due to failure to cooperate with investigation despite initial compliance.
Dr Utkarsh Pathak v. Dr Sreenivas Madireddy
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the suit could not be summarily rejected.