Delhi High Court
105,237 judgments
Anuj Vohra v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed verification of the petitioner's entitlement to pro rata pension in line with earlier judgments and ordered payment of arrears with interest if eligible.
Vimlesh Kumar Dangi and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant the petitioners' claims for financial upgradations under the ACP and MACP schemes in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court precedents, subject to any future Supreme Court orders.
Uday Singh v. All India Institute of Medical Science & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld AIIMS's rejection of a belated OBC certificate and denied extension for submission of qualifying degree documents, emphasizing strict adherence to admission eligibility conditions.
Joginder Singh Nijjar v. M/s Omaxe Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple enforcement petitions under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
Mohd. Shahid v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi; Amir Khan v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under the NDPS Act, ruling that refusal to be searched in presence of a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer validates search, and that searches in public places under Section 43 do not require Magistrate authorization.
Mohd. Shahid v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi; Amir Khan v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act, ruling that informing accused of their right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer suffices under Section 50, and that searches in public places under Section 43 do not require prior authorization, while dismissing challenges based on procedural irregularities and delay in sample testing.
Dr. Vikram Hingorani and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed mutation of property rights in favor of decree holders under a final partition decree, rejecting L&DO's refusal based on dues attributable to other co-owners.
Chhotu Kumar @ Chote Fauji v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court set aside conviction under Section 307 IPC due to identical police witness testimonies and inadmissible forensic reports, acquitting appellant of attempted murder charges.
City Lifeline Travels Private Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator by a party interested in the dispute is impermissible and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
City Lifeline Travels Private Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator by a party interested in the dispute is impermissible, and appointed an independent former Supreme Court judge as sole arbitrator in accordance with the arbitration agreement and law.
Mohd. Musa v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 411 IPC for possession and dealing in stolen motorcycle parts despite ownership inconsistencies, directing concurrent sentences for related offences.
Netaji Subash Place Traders Welfare Association v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed the auction of commercial plots at Netaji Subhash Place after DDA assured adequate parking and infrastructure measures, vacating the interim stay on the auction process.
Sh. Rahul Vaid v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified that court-imposed conditions on the petitioner’s passport and travel remain binding despite issuance of a new passport, directing authorities to ensure compliance.
SI GD Anil Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant the petitioner’s financial upgradations under the ACP and MACP schemes in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court precedents within twelve weeks.
P B Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner had no vested right to upgradation to Additional Secretary and that the government lawfully returned the proposal due to departmental proceedings and prior judicial decisions.
Ashok Singhal v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner to administer the estate of the deceased under a valid Will dated 1991, despite opposition by one heir who was set ex-parte.
M/S. VEEKAY PRESTRESSED PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH NORTHERN RAILWAYS
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of arbitration challenge petitions pending before different courts to consolidate adjudication and avoid conflicting awards arising from the same contract.
Nitin Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the matter of alleged illegal construction at premises No. 138-139, Chandni Chowk within two weeks after hearing the parties.
M/S. JAY PRESTRESSED PRODUCTS LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH NORTHERN RAILWAYS
The Delhi High Court ordered transfer and consolidation of multiple arbitration challenge petitions arising from the same contract to avoid multiplicity and conflicting awards.
National Highway Authority of India v. D.D. Parlawar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s decision that deputation service, once absorbed, counts as regular service for promotion eligibility.