National Highway Authority of India v. D.D. Parlawar

Delhi High Court · 25 Jan 2021 · 2021:DHC:282-DB
Manmohan; Asha Menon
W.P. (C) 551/2021
2021:DHC:282-DB
administrative appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s decision that deputation service, once absorbed, counts as regular service for promotion eligibility.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P. (C) 551/2021 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 551/2021 & CM APPLs. 1456-1458/2021
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Nikhil Goel with Mr.Vinay Mathur, Advocates.
VERSUS
D.D. PARLAWAR ..... Respondent
Through Mr.S.K.Gupta with Ms.Shubhi Srivastava, Advocates.
Date of Decision: 25th January, 2021
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J (Oral)

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 03: rd

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the CAT has failed to understand the true nature of ‘deputation’ inasmuch as during the deputation period, the officer holds lien on the cadre post in parent department and the said recruitment cannot be taken as regular service until the officer is ‘absorbed’ in the deputation post. September, 2020 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal [CAT] in OA Nos.3315/2019 and 876/2020 whereby the respondent’s applications have been allowed and he has been deemed to be eligible for consideration for promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused 2021:DHC:282-DB W.P. (C) 551/2021 2 of 2 the paper book, this Court finds that the respondent was an Assistant Engineer, who had been sent on deputation to NHAI as ‘Manager’ on 13th October, 2013. He was absolved in the said post on 12th

4. In the impugned order, CAT has relied upon its previous order, confirmed by the Division Bench of this Court in WP(C) No.9227/14 wherein it was held that the experience of an officer in the post of Manager – whether on promotion or on deputation – must be taken into account for the purpose of determining the eligibility of promotion. Further the petitioner itself has issued a Circular dated 22 October, 2018. Next promotion was to the post of DGM and an advertisement was issued in Feb 2019 for the same. However, the respondent was not considered, as according to petitioner, he did not have five years regular service in the post of Manager. nd May, 2017 in terms of the aforesaid judgment as well. Learned counsel for the respondent has handed over a copy of the Circular dated 22nd

5. In view thereof, the present impugned order calls for no interference in the writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, the writ petition along with pending applications are dismissed. May, 2017, which is taken on record. MANMOHAN, J ASHA MENON, J JANUARY 25, 2021 KA