Delhi High Court
105,237 judgments
Score Information Technologies Limited v. GR Infra Projects Limited
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by a party with an interest in the dispute is impermissible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and terminated such arbitrator's mandate.
M/S ELECON POWER INFRA LTD. v. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.
The Delhi High Court set aside a blacklisting order for lack of clear notice and opportunity of hearing, emphasizing the necessity of explicit communication before imposing such a severe penalty.
Shri Manoj Kumar v. Shri Amit Gupta & Ors.
The High Court set aside a status quo injunction passed against a non-party tenant, emphasizing the necessity of impleadment and opportunity to be heard before affecting possession rights.
Vijay Gandhi & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and non-prosecution by the complainant.
M/S INDIABULLS DISTRIBUTION SERVICES LIMITED v. M/S B.G.A REALTORS
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of arbitration petitions following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Najmus Sakib v. National Investigation Agency; Al Mamun Kamal v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court upheld the extension of investigation and judicial custody under UAPA due to voluminous digital evidence and pending forensic reports, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the extension order.
Nischalraunaq Nawal Singh v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as earlier beneficiaries, setting aside a rejection based solely on the in personam nature of prior judgments.
Vikas Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a congenital abnormality like Dextrocardia can only disqualify a candidate if it impedes efficient discharge of duties, directing a fresh medical examination to determine fitness for appointment.
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Nizamuddin @ Nizam
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order directing production of call detail records of the Investigating Officer and raiding team, excluding those of the secret informer, affirming the accused's right to relevant documents under Section 91 CrPC while protecting privacy and investigation integrity.
Manoj Kumar and Others v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide the petitioners' pending representation seeking relaxation of mandatory service for permanent absorption within six weeks, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Prince Sharma & Ors. v. The State Through Its Chief Secretary & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute.
Pabitra Roychaudhuri v. Commissioner of VAT, Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed GNCTD to pay the outstanding retainership fees to its former Additional Standing Counsel, emphasizing the Government’s duty to clear lawyers’ fees promptly.
Shahnaz Begum v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's regular bail application in a murder case at an advanced trial stage, holding that the gravity of offence and eyewitness evidence preclude bail, while keeping interim medical bail pending further review.
Arun Chaudhary v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with interest on delayed arrears.
M/S VSK TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. v. DELHI JAL BOARD
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator by a party interested in the dispute is impermissible and appointed an independent arbitrator to adjudicate the contractual disputes.
Shiny Verma Bakshi v. Dr. Gurneet Singh Bakshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking enhancement of interim maintenance, upholding the Rs.8,000 monthly maintenance granted to the wife, finding no evidence of undisclosed income by the husband and noting the wife’s own financial position.
Ajay Kumar Puri & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for pay parity with direct recruits, holding that deputation appointments are governed by the Recruitment Rules in force at the time and acceptance of pay scale bars subsequent claims.
M/S VSK TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. v. DELHI JAL BOARD
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an Arbitrator by a party interested in the outcome is impermissible and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Binit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier precedents, with interest on delayed arrears and procedural safeguards for denial.
Centrlient Pharmaceuticals Netherlands B.V. ANR. v. Dalas Biotech Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' application seeking discovery by interrogatories in a patent infringement suit, holding that interrogatories cannot substitute for cross-examination and confidential, irrelevant documents cannot be compelled.