Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
GAE Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. GE T&D India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitrator's order terminating arbitration, holding that the settlement agreement did not finally resolve all disputes and that allegations of coercion required adjudication by the arbitral tribunal.
Shri Vishal and Company Consy Contractor v. The Defence Secretary, Ministry of Defence
The Delhi High Court decreed partial recovery of outstanding conservancy service payments with interest, rejecting unproven damages claims for mental agony and loss of business.
Dr. Priya Vrata v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from the Tribunal’s order, and modified the Tribunal’s order accordingly.
Devraj Singh Dagur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending appeal within four weeks, emphasizing timely disposal of appeals to prevent injustice.
S.S. Saini v. Air Force Naval Housing Board
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator by one year under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon joint petition and no objection from the respondent.
Dr Sudarshan Kumar Arya & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognition of CPS Mumbai Diploma qualifications does not confer equivalence, upholding their ineligibility to appear in the DNB-PDCET Examination 2024 under Clause 4.8.
Mahipal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the answer key of a recruitment exam question, holding that courts must defer to expert opinions in academic matters unless a patent error is demonstrated.
Shivani v. Ashish Kumar
The High Court upheld the discharge of the accused in a kidnapping and sexual offence case due to lack of prima facie evidence and dismissed the State's delayed appeal.
Lucky Garg & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Joginder & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 354, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Manjeet Singh & Ors. v. The State, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Jitender Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to recall a witness for cross-examination on compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing mandatory procedural safeguards in search and seizure operations.
Gurpreet Sobti v. DDA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to entertain challenges to Monitoring Committee decisions, including demolition orders, thereby barring the High Court from entertaining the writ petition.
Shyam Garg and Anr. v. Union of India and Anrs.
Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued against bank loan defaulters in absence of criminal proceedings in India, affirming the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Ajai Kumar & Ors. v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging dismissal of an industrial dispute on non-espousal grounds, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified review under Section 114 CPC.
Captain Amit Tyagi v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the three-year suspension of a pilot’s license for testing positive in a pre-flight Breath Analyzer test, affirming the zero-tolerance alcohol policy under aviation regulations and rejecting claims of false positives due to cosmetic treatment.
Parviom Technologies Private Limited v. Karthik Devraj and Others
The Delhi High Court held that service of summons at a temporary address or inaccessible email is invalid, set aside closure of defendant's right to file written statement, and condoned delay in appeal.
Sunil Yadav v. Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed GEM's review petition, affirming that the contract must be awarded to the undisputed H1 bidder and that GEM, as a facilitator portal, must implement court orders without bearing liability for bid creation errors.
M/S FERON LIFE SCIENCES PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER, DELHI GST AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without reasons and hearing is invalid and modified the cancellation to be effective from the date of the show cause notice.
M/S MAYA RAM KRISHAN LAL JAIN AND ANR. v. M/S SHRI BISHAN DASS TRADERS AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of over 130 days delay in filing a commercial appeal, holding that vague reasons like misplacement of case files do not constitute sufficient cause under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.