Delhi High Court
100,734 judgments
Jagriti@Gayatri v. Vikas Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of mandatory and permanent injunction in favor of the registered owner against the licensee-appellant, dismissing her claim of ownership and holding that relief under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is maintainable without trial where defenses are untenable.
Sarjo Devi @ Saroj v. Dharampal (Deceased) Through LRs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order allowing a belated application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC to set aside an ex parte order, holding that such applications must be filed on or before the next hearing date and unexplained delay beyond three years is barred by limitation.
Yogesh Kumar Verma v. Lieutenant Governor
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's interim order staying GNCTD promotions based on a revised roster and directed GNCTD to file a reply within ten working days, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Shri Pankaj Arora v. AVV Hospitality LLP & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal may defer deciding jurisdictional objections until after recording evidence and dismissed the petition seeking termination of the arbitrator’s mandate for deferring such a decision.
Sauma Gupta v. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the registration of the 'Sushant Welfare Trust' within four weeks subject to document rectification, disposing of the writ petition with liberty to re-approach if aggrieved.
Sirisha Dinavahi Bansal v. Rajiv Bansal
The Delhi High Court held that a petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging an interim custody order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act is not maintainable when an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 29 of the Act is available.
Saumya Gupta v. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the registration authority to register the Muskan Welfare Trust deed within four weeks subject to rectification of deficiencies, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Afshana & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed DTIDC to refrain from coercive action and file detailed affidavits regarding license fee demands from ISBT shop licensees during COVID-19 lockdown, while distinguishing between licensees in possession and those not yet handed possession.
Dr. Vijender Kumar v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim extension for MDS thesis submission amid conflicting university deadlines and administrative confusion during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the superior authority of the Executive Council over the Board of Research Studies.
M/S BK STRUCTURAL CONTRACTS PVT LTD v. RATISH MAHESH THAKUR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the arbitration clause in the Work Order prevails over conflicting jurisdiction clauses in invoices.
Rohit v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on a child under the POCSO Act and IPC, relying on the credible testimony of the child victim corroborated by medical and DNA evidence, dismissing the appeal.
Udai Shankar Srivastava v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking promotion by directing the respondents to expedite the Departmental Promotion Committee process and promote the petitioner before his retirement, following official concession of relief.
Lt. Col. Manish Narayan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that attachment orders pending disciplinary proceedings fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal, and a writ petition challenging non-inclusion in a posting order under such circumstances is not maintainable.
Dr Waryam Singh v. Dr Ankit Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted interim access to the respondent for maintenance of air conditioners in a disputed gated area, subject to notice, without prejudice to ownership rights.
VINS BIOPRODUCTS LIMITED & ANR. v. MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that rejection of a tender bid does not amount to debarment unless explicitly stated, and dismissed the petition challenging the rejection and alleged debarment.
Rina Nagrani v. Col. (Retd) Ajit Nagrani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the respondent complied with maintenance payment orders and both parties consented to expeditious disposal of the pending appeal.
Bar Council of Delhi v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Government to proceed with the tender process for advocates registered under the welfare scheme while directing further consideration of inclusion of advocates from NCR and late registrations.
Unwan Amrohi v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused involved in a large-scale fake currency and arms syndicate, emphasizing the stringent approach required in economic offence cases.
Rajender v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for rape and criminal intimidation, relying on consistent prosecutrix testimony and conclusive forensic evidence.
Sheela Devi @Sheela Bansal v. Preeti Aroroa
The Delhi High Court set aside the adjournment of an eviction petition during the COVID-19 pandemic, directing the matter to be listed for hearing in accordance with the Court's administrative order allowing such petitions to proceed.