Saumya Gupta v. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Jul 2020 · 2020:DHC:2315
C. Hari Shankar
WP(C) 4344/2020
2020:DHC:2315
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the registration authority to register the Muskan Welfare Trust deed within four weeks subject to rectification of deficiencies, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) 4344/2020
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decided on 20th July, 2020
WP(C) 4344/2020
SAUMYA GUPTA ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Neha Garg , Adv.
VERSUS
THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC for GNCTD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C .HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL)
20.07.2020 (Video-Conferencing)
C .HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. The only prayer, in this petition, is for a direction to the Subrespect of “Muskan Welfare Trust”, presented for registration on 2nd August, 2019.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that she has instructions to state that the needful would be done within a period of four weeks, and submits that the petitioner may approach the concerned officer, with the relevant records and a copy of this order, whereupon, subject to rectification of any deficiency, if any, the 2020:DHC:2315 WP(C) 4344/2020 document would be duly registered.

3. Ms. Neha Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, with the said assurance, the grievance in the petition stands redressed.

4. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to approach the office of Respondent No. 2 on 23rd July, 2020 at 11 AM, with the copy of this order as downloaded from the website of this Court, and the relevant records. Needless to say, registration of the Trust Deed would be subject to rectification of deficiencies, if any, in the documents.

5. Subject to the above, the Respondent No. 2 is directed to do the needful within a period of four weeks from today, as ensured by the learned counsel for the respondents.

6. Needless to say, if the petitioner continues to remain aggrieved, it would be open for the petitioner to re-approach this Court.

7. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.