Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Swaraj

11 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8141-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order directing re-examination of a candidate declared medically unfit, holding that expert medical board opinions cannot be disregarded based on private medical reports.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical examination medical unfitness Central Administrative Tribunal Review Medical Examination Board

LELOGIX DESIGN SOLUTION PVT LTD v. SALES TAX OFFICER / AVATO & ORS

11 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8151-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to file an appeal against a tax demand order despite pending challenges to GST notifications before the Supreme Court, directing a fair hearing and reasoned adjudication subject to the Supreme Court's final ruling.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A GST Act Notification validity GST Council recommendation Show Cause Notice

M/S ANY TIME SECURITY SERVICES v. NORTHERN RAILWAY

11 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the arbitrator accordingly, leaving all substantive disputes to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Dr. Vivek Kumar Mathur v. Union of India and Ors

11 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8083-DB

The Delhi High Court held that while there is no legal right to seek posting based on parental illness, authorities must consider such requests reasonably and release withheld salary, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed posting transfer Central Armed Police Forces caregiver medical facilities

Pratibha v. Union of India & Anr

11 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:8247-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a probationary officer for failure to meet performance targets within the maximum probation period, rejecting claims of discrimination and entitlement to further extension.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant probationary employee termination unsatisfactory performance probation period extension

Kumari Archana v. Sashastra Seema Bal and Anr

11 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8055-DB

The writ petition challenging a transfer order was dismissed as withdrawn after the respondents cancelled the impugned transfer, rendering the petition infructuous.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition transfer order cancellation infructuous petition

Vivek Malhotra v. Shilpa Sood

11 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8134-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting unsupervised visitation rights to the father, emphasizing the child's welfare and gradual bonding despite the mother's objections and alleged obstruction.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child welfare visitation rights unsupervised visitation custody dispute

Jasleen Kaur Kapoor v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax

11 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8133-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without explicit notice and opportunity to be heard, directing cancellation effective only from the date business ceased.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Show Cause Notice Section 29 CGST Act

M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT)

11 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8092-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals challenging CESTAT orders, holding that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, condoned delay subject to costs, and restored appeals for merits adjudication in line with Supreme Court precedent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28 proper officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Ashvini Kumar Sharma v. Union of India

11 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8118-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant retained in service despite disability from a service injury is entitled to disability compensation under Rule 9(3) of the CCS (EOP) Rules, overruling the time-bar defense under Rule 6.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability compensation Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 1939 Rule 9(3) Rule 6

Harvinder Malik v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8095-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and reinstated a Railway Police Constable dismissed years after appointment on the ground of invalid educational certificates issued by a dissolved board, emphasizing equity and bona fide possession of qualifications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant educational qualifications dismissal from service Board of Higher Secondary Education validity of certificates

Dileep G v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.

11 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8121-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order dismissing the petitioner's claim of eligibility for a Senior Scientific Officer post, holding that advertised essential qualifications cannot be overridden by post-advertisement criteria and directing reconsideration of the petitioner's candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant essential qualifications experience certificate post advertisement criteria grade pay

Rinku Singh v. The President’s Secretariat & Anr.

11 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8120-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's dismissal of a service-related Original Application for lack of territorial jurisdiction and absence of necessary parties, emphasizing proper forum and procedural compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal territorial jurisdiction Original Application Governor's Secretariat

EX SEP RAJI HASAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

11 Sep 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:8091-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner whose conviction and dismissal were quashed by the Armed Forces Tribunal is entitled to consequential benefits similar to those granted to co-accused, and modified the Tribunal’s order accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal General Court Martial Consequential benefits Quashing of conviction

K Arjun Singh and Others v. GM Modular Pvt. Ltd.

11 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8090-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ad interim injunction against registered trademarks granted without final adjudication, directing the trial court to decide the interim application afresh uninfluenced by prior observations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction registered trademark trademark infringement passing off

Union of India v. MWO Ramesh Patil Budha

11 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8053-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Primary Hypertension Release Medical Board

Gaurav v. Superintendent, CGST

11 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8013-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective reasons and due process, setting aside an order lacking such compliance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Input Tax Credit

Zoom Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 5(1), New Delhi

11 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8076-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under Sections 148 and 148A of the Income Tax Act against an insurance broker, holding that the Assessing Officer’s reasoned opinion based on credible information justifies reopening assessment despite the petitioner’s declaration of income.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Reassessment

Jaspal Singh Khokar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

11 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8021

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Raghvendra Singhania & Ors. v. Bajaj Finance Limited & Ors.

11 Sep 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:7950

Delhi High Court dismissed the challenge to an arbitral award upholding the validity of the arbitrator's appointment and the lender's sale of pledged securities after reasonable notice under the Loan Against Securities agreement.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Loan Against Securities pledged securities