Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Santosh Devi v. Suresh Kumar Gupta

10 Sep 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8132

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that bona fide requirement by the landlord for dependent family members is maintainable without permission under the Slum Areas Act, and dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging the eviction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition bona fide requirement

Jitender Kumar Goomber v. Surinder Pal Singh

10 Sep 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8125

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord-tenant relationship and bona fide requirement of the landlord, and dismissed the tenant's revision petition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant landlord-tenant relationship bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act

Sudhi Isac v. Union of India

10 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8105-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the termination of a compassionate appointment on grounds of non-disclosure of a pending criminal case, emphasizing a holistic and proportionality-based assessment of suitability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment non-disclosure criminal antecedents termination

Ex Constable Abhishek Haldar v. Union of India & Anr

10 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8061-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a CISF constable for proven gross misconduct and insubordination, ruling that the punishment was proportionate and the disciplinary process fair.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings gross misconduct indiscipline insubordination

Col Pradeep Goswami v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 1761
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of a petition challenging adverse entries in Annual Confidential Reports, holding that subjective grading by reporting officers cannot be interfered with absent mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Annual Confidential Reports Armed Forces Tribunal Subjective discretion Mala fide

Chauhan Patti Residents Welfare Association v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

10 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8078

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the MCD’s allotment of a venue for Ramleela and Dussera events, holding that no vested right exists and allotment on a first-come-first-serve basis is lawful.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant venue allotment Ramleela Dussera Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Ram Daras v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

10 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8077

The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider petitioners' representations for meat selling licenses at Dabri Mor market in compliance with MCD Policy and Aircraft Rules, ensuring proper waste management near the aerodrome.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rule 91 Aircraft Rules 1937 license revocation meat selling policy DDA allotment

Major Anish Muralidhar and Caption Carolin Johnson v. Ex Hav Dipak Rajkhowa

10 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7978-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that diseases not present at entry are attributable to military service unless proven otherwise.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

National Aluminium Company Limited v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr

10 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8006-DB

Delhi High Court permitted a PSU to file a belated appeal against a GST demand order beyond limitation, pending Supreme Court's decision on validity of extension notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Limitation period

Meena Jindal v. Vijay Kumar

10 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7985

The High Court held that interlocutory orders dismissing applications under Order VI Rule 17 CPC are not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC, and dismissed the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory order Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Jackie Verma & Ors. v. Sanjay Sharma

10 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8060

The High Court held that a plaint disclosing cause of action cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely on alleged Income Tax Act violations, leaving such issues for trial.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action rejection of plaint Sections 269SS and 269ST Income Tax Act

Rajesh Kumar Sachdeva v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.

10 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8040

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking conversion of electricity connection category, directing the petitioner to approach the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum as per the regulatory scheme.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Electricity connection category Domestic connection

Anita Munjal v. Vibhuti Jauhari & Ors.

10 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8032

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint in a partition suit, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action, was within limitation, and the court had jurisdiction under Section 17 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action partition suit limitation

Mohammad Rashid v. Commissioner of Customs

10 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7960-DB

The Delhi High Court held that non-appearance for appraisement does not justify withholding issuance of a Show Cause Notice under Section 110 of the Customs Act, and ordered release of seized goods after statutory period expired.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 110 Show Cause Notice Detention of goods

Logica Infoway Ltd. v. The Union of India

10 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7964-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of GST notifications extending adjudication timelines.

tax remanded Significant CGST Act Section 73 Section 74 Section 168A

Imran v. Commissioner of Customs, IGI Airport

10 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7957-DB

The Delhi High Court directed Customs to pay compensation with interest to a petitioner after disposal of seized gold, emphasizing procedural fairness and proper intimation in Customs proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 seizure and disposal of goods redemption fine penalty under Customs Act

Ajit Kumar v. Union of India

10 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7971-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing continuation of interim protection against transfer and mandated the Tribunal to decide the pending application on merits within two weeks.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal transfer interim protection Original Application

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. v. Kripanand Narwaria & Anr.

10 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7970-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's order granting respondents benefits under the GPF-cum-Pension Scheme and recoupment of CPF with interest, relying on a recent authoritative judgment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant General Provident Fund cum Pension Scheme Central Administrative Tribunal recoupment of CPF 8% simple interest

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Ruchi

10 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7974-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a higher-scoring candidate by creating a supernumerary post without disturbing the incumbent appointed due to administrative error.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant appointment administrative tribunal supernumerary post merit

Rahul Kumar v. New Delhi Municipal Council

10 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7952-DB

The High Court held that withdrawing a termination order and issuing a fresh one does not constitute contempt of an interim stay if the fresh order provides a new cause of action and is challengeable in law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant interim order contempt of court termination order Central Administrative Tribunal