Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Abdul Mir Khalick v. Oriflame India Pvt. Ltd.

25 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5603-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that courts must exercise discretion cautiously under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and not pass judgment solely on non-filing of written statement without considering disputed facts or evidence, and set aside a decree granting pre-suit interest without legal basis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC discretionary judgment failure to file written statement pre-suit interest

Purshottam Lal Tandon v. M/S City Super Market & Ors

25 Jul 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5556

The Delhi High Court held that when an amendment causes a suit to exceed the Court's pecuniary jurisdiction, the suit should be transferred under Section 24(5) CPC rather than plaint returned, to avoid de novo proceedings and further justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint pecuniary jurisdiction Section 24(5) CPC Order VII Rule 10 CPC

Grandeur Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Gramin Vikas Trust

25 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5935

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) Arbitral Tribunal mandate extension High Court jurisdiction

Meshar Jahan & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

24 Jul 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5507

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that serious offences like rape require trial despite matrimonial disputes and possible settlements.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC rape

PIO, RP CELL, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR

24 Jul 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:5801

The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's award of Rs. 50,000 compensation against SDMC for wilful denial of RTI information regarding unauthorized parking charges, affirming the Commission's broad remedial powers under Section 19(8)(b) of the RTI Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 19(8)(b) compensation Central Information Commission

Liberty General Insurance Co Ltd v. Lallan Thakur @ Lalan Kumar & Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:5800

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal's award of compensation for injuries and permanent disability caused by rash and negligent driving.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Compensation Permanent Disability

Sanjeev Malik v. M/S Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors

24 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:5798
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of 799 days delay in filing an appeal against an ex-parte Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause and was duly served with notices.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 ex-parte award Motor Vehicles Act 1988

Bibi Sabera v. Major Dr. Chandra Shekhar Pant@ Himmat Khan

24 Jul 2024 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2024:DHC:5835

The Delhi High Court held that a woman’s citizenship status is irrelevant for relief under the Domestic Violence Act and set aside the order directing inquiry into the petitioner’s citizenship.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act shared household citizenship irrelevant domestic relationship

Pulin Comtrade Limited v. The Handicrafts and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India Ltd

24 Jul 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:6140

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award's denial of interest for 2015-2017, holding that the arbitrator erred in ignoring contractual terms mandating interest on term deposits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 33 Interest on deposits

The National Insurance Co Ltd v. Dilip Kumar & Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6085

The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing the disability percentage to account for pre-existing disability, thereby recalculating just and reasonable compensation payable.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle accident compensation functional disability pre-existing disability

Dilip Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6103
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's challenge to the compensation awarded for injuries in a motor accident, holding that the quantum had already been modified in a prior appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of future income marriage prospects

Sri Ram Packers v. Ganga Ram & Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6075

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of a 427-day delay in filing an appeal, holding that ignorance of the order and reliance on counsel's assurances do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 sufficient cause limitation period

Smt. Daya Rani v. Rajeev Gulati

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:6396

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that part payment without endorsement on the cheque negates the offence of cheque dishonour.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Part payment endorsement Section 139 presumption

Paras Arora v. M/S Aggarwal Associates

24 Jul 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:5501-DB

The Delhi High Court held that RERA does not have jurisdiction over projects completed before its commencement, dismissing the appellant's complaint and appeal for lack of maintainability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant RERA jurisdiction Completion Certificate ongoing projects withdrawal of complaint

Sharad Bhansali & Anr. v. Mukesh Aggarwal & Anr.

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5429
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld that an Agreement to Sell followed by possession under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act attracts stamp duty under Article 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, dismissing the appeal against the arbitrator's order impounding the insufficiently stamped ATS.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Section 53A Transfer of Property Act Article 23A Indian Stamp Act Stamp duty

Prateek Soni v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

24 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued to deceased assessees without addressing legal representatives are invalid, quashing such notices and allowing fresh proceedings against legal heirs in accordance with law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice Section 159 legal representatives Reassessment

Varun Kumar and Ors. v. Latika Vats

24 Jul 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:5627

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of domestic violence proceedings, holding that a settlement does not bar fresh complaints and disputed facts preclude summary quashing.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 482 CrPC Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Settlement Agreement Domestic violence

Sh Lalit Kishore & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

24 Jul 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:5716

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against the petitioners for cheating and criminal conspiracy in a bank loan dispute after the parties settled their dues and the fraud declaration was set aside.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. commercial dispute settlement

Usha Jain v. M/S Vigneshwara Developwell P. Ltd.

24 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5444

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' application for release of funds deposited with the Court in a company winding up proceeding, holding that the amount forms part of the liquidation estate and must be claimed before the Official Liquidator.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Company winding up Buy-back agreement Deposit with Court Official Liquidator

JUSTICE FOR ALL v. Lieutenant Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:5489-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the University Chancellor to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s representation concerning alleged violations of seat reservation provisions under the DPCI Act, without adjudicating on the merits.

administrative other Delhi Professional Colleges or Institutions Act, 2007 seat reservation Section 12(1)(b) Section 12(2)