Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Amit Kumar Shukla v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(C) 8014/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive details in the excerpt.
BISWAJIT MAHATO v. UNION OF INDIA
The judgment in W.P.(C) 8139/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) No. 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
SONALIMPEX v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of writ petitions with liberty to file objections before the statutory Objection Hearing Authority under Section 74 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004.
Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. v. SPML Infra Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of the petition as settled by a valid settlement agreement between the parties.
United Constructions v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees must be honoured on demand without court interference except in cases of fraud or irretrievable injustice, dismissing the appellant's plea to restrain encashment.
Pawan Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's non-objection.
Sudarshan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Manohar Chowdhry and Associates
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve lease-related disputes where parties agreed to arbitration but failed to agree on the arbitrator.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Raja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that repeal of Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by the 2018 Amendment without a saving clause does not automatically bar pending proceedings, and leave to appeal against acquittal under the unamended Act is maintainable.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Raja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the CBI's appeal against acquittal in the 2G case was maintainable despite procedural objections, affirming that government sanction and appointment of Special Public Prosecutors under Sections 378(2) and 24(8) Cr.P.C. are executive functions not requiring disclosure of internal files to respondents.
R K Chandolia v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced judgment in a writ petition involving the Union of India, directing the order to be uploaded on the Court's website, with no detailed reasoning or decision provided in the excerpt.
Sharad Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The High Court of Delhi reserved and pronounced judgment in W.P.(C) 8620/2020 filed by Sharad Kumar against the Union of India, with the order directed to be uploaded on the Court's website.
UFO Contemporary Inc. v. Creative Kids Wear (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark "UFO" for children's clothing, holding that use of a trade mark on goods manufactured in India for export constitutes use in India under Section 56 of the Trade Marks Act, and that defendants' use was infringing and mala fide.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. A. Raja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the status quo order on properties attached under PMLA pending final adjudication of leave to appeal against acquittal, refusing their release on indemnity bonds at this stage.
MS BRIDGE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CO PVT LTD v. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD
The Delhi High Court granted a nine-month extension to the sole Arbitrator to conclude arbitral proceedings and pass the award upon an unopposed petition.
Delhi Labour Union v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking welfare measures for women employees by directing the authorities to treat it as a representation and decide it in accordance with law and policy.
Rajiv Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Government's direction under Section 378(2) Cr.P.C. to file a criminal leave to appeal is an executive decision not subject to judicial review, and the appeal filed by the CBI was valid despite procedural and authorization challenges.
Ramesh Boghabhai Bhut v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust for lack of territorial jurisdiction and absence of criminal intent, holding the dispute to be essentially civil in nature.
Divya Bansal v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking admission upgradation after the petitioner inadvertently opted out of the counselling process, holding that such procedural mistakes cannot be condoned.