Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Hari Narayan Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in W.P.(C) 7652/2020, referring to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020, without providing substantive details in the available text.
Sanjeev Verma v. Amita Arora
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to resolve disputes arising from property development agreements where parties failed to agree on the arbitrator.
Karam Chand v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(C) 9161/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) No. 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
Abhimanyu Nayak v. Union of India
Judgment in W.P.(C) 7954/2020 by Delhi High Court refers to judgment in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without substantive details.
Deepender Singh Parmar v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(C) 8136/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
Chandra Bhan v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(C) 7422/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(C) 7639/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) No. 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
Paraminder Singh Kalra v. The Commissioner, Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that multiple criminal complaints under the Income Tax Act based on the same core facts and evidence constitute the same transaction and must be tried jointly under Section 220 CrPC.
Devesh Kumar Singh v. Union of India
Judgment in W.P.(C) 8019/2020 delivered by Delhi High Court on 24th November 2020, referencing judgment in W.P.(C) 98/2020, with no substantive details provided.
KHANGEMBAM SANJAY SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA
The judgment in W.P.(C) 8140/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
Praveen Soni v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of W.P.(C) 8324/2020 by referring to the judgment in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without independent reasoning.
Raj Kumar Bharadwaj v. Union of India & Ors.
The judgment in W.P.(C) 8493/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive details.
Dholi Spintex Pvt. Ltd. v. Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's wilful breach of undertaking by participating in arbitration proceedings constituted contempt of court and imposed a fine on the Managing Director, while disposing of the interim injunction application.
Shravan Kumar Mittireddy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court delivered its judgment in W.P.(C) 8409/2020 involving Shravan Kumar Mittireddy and Union of India, referencing a related case W.P.(C) 98/2020, with limited details provided.
Mohit Mehta v. Nayanika Thakur
The Delhi High Court held that criminal cases and complaints under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act must be tried by Magistrates and cannot be transferred to Family Courts, which lack jurisdiction over such matters.
Raj Kumar Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of W.P.(C) 7761/2020 by referring to the judgment in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive reasons in the excerpt.
Kamal Kumar v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(C) 8201/2020 refers to the decision in W.P.(C) 98/2020 without providing substantive details.