Delhi High Court

99,566 judgments

Year:

Sonu Kumar Dubey v. Union of India; Mahitosh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India

23 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3723-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions challenging AFT orders denying pro rata pension, holding the AFT bound by High Court precedents and directing payment with arrears and interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pro rata pension Armed Forces Tribunal Article 226 jurisdiction AFT Act 2007

Mohd. Israar v. SDMC and Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Najmiwaziri · 2020:DHC:3878

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, resulting in dismissal of the petition and cancellation of the scheduled hearing.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn early hearing

CD Pharma India Private Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Yogesh Khanna · 2020:DHC:3702

The Delhi High Court refused to transfer the investigation to CBI, holding the police probe fair and directing a senior officer to review specific allegations before the trial court proceeds.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant transfer of investigation closure report Section 172 CrPC Economic Offences Wing

Pacific Projects Limited v. Asstt CIT

23 Dec 2020 · Manmohan J; Sanjeev Narula J · 2020:DHC:3716-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that limitation under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act begins from actual receipt or knowledge of the ITAT order, quashing the dismissal of the recall application and directing fresh hearing on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 254(2) Income Tax Act limitation period actual knowledge communication of order

Vayam Technologies Limited and Anr. v. Canara Bank and Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3715

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel banks to accept restructuring proposals or operate accounts, directing the parties to negotiate restructuring within a fixed timeline before banks may pursue recovery.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Strategic Debt Restructuring Joint Lenders Forum Non-Performing Asset Trust & Retention Account

M/S Kumar Food Industries Ltd v. SDM Alipur Delhi Through Govt of NCT and Ors

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3706

The Delhi High Court held that a party against whom ex-parte labour awards are passed must be given access to records to challenge them and stayed bank attachment pending expeditious adjudication of challenge applications.

civil petition_allowed Significant ex-parte award Labour Court Order IX Rule 13 CPC access to records

Mohd. Hussain & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

23 Dec 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:3713

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC withdrawal of prosecution

Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3709

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to establish and disclose clear timelines and procedures for issuance and digital transmission of academic credentials to ensure timely delivery to students.

administrative other Significant University of Delhi digital degree certificates Digilocker academic transcripts

Camions Logistics Solutions Private Limited v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, OSD, TDS Circle-73-1, New Delhi & Anr.

23 Dec 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:3717-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the assessing officer must mandatorily compute tax liability under Rule 28AA before refusing a NIL TDS certificate under Section 197, and set aside the impugned order for non-application of mind.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 Income Tax Act Rule 28AA Income Tax Rules Tax Deduction at Source Non-application of mind

Muskaan Aggarwal v. University of Delhi

23 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3721-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the University of Delhi's admission criteria change made pursuant to a binding judicial direction, holding that relief cannot be granted after the academic session has elapsed and emphasizing the finality of the earlier judgment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant admission criteria University of Delhi eligibility corrigendum

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ranjana Devi & Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · J. R. Midha · 2020:DHC:3719

Delhi High Court partly allowed insurer's appeal in motor accident claim by reducing compensation awarded for loss of consortium and interest to a fair and reasonable total of Rs.5,00,000/-.

civil appeal_allowed motor accident claim compensation loss of consortium loss of dependency

Adharshila Consultants v. Airports Authority of India

23 Dec 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:3720

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the sole arbitrator's mandate by three months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to conclude arbitration proceedings.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of arbitrator mandate sole arbitrator

M/S Kumar Food Industries Ltd v. SDM Alipur Delhi Through Govt of NCT and Ors

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3703

The Delhi High Court held that a party against whom ex-parte labour awards are passed must be given access to records to challenge them, stayed bank attachment pending adjudication, and directed expeditious hearing of stay applications.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte award Labour Court Order IX Rule 13 CPC access to records

Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3710

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to establish clear timelines and procedures for issuing digital academic certificates and uploading data to Digilocker to prevent student inconvenience.

administrative other University of Delhi digital degree certificates Digilocker academic transcripts

Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3712

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to establish clear timelines and procedures for issuance and digital transmission of academic documents to prevent student inconvenience and repeated litigation.

administrative other University of Delhi digital degree certificates Digilocker academic transcripts

M/S Kumar Food Industries Ltd v. SDM Alipur Delhi Through Govt of NCT and Ors

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3705

The Delhi High Court held that parties against whom ex-parte labour awards are passed must be granted access to court records to challenge the awards and stayed enforcement actions pending adjudication of challenge applications.

civil petition_allowed Significant ex-parte award Labour Court Order IX Rule 13 CPC access to court records

Sonu Kumar Dubey v. Union of India; Mahitosh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India

23 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3722-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions challenging AFT orders denying pro rata pension, holding that the AFT is bound by High Court precedents and directing payment of pension with arrears and interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pro rata pension Armed Forces Tribunal Article 226 jurisdiction

M/S Kumar Food Industries Ltd v. SDM Alipur Delhi Through Govt of NCT and Ors.

23 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3707

The Delhi High Court held that a party against whom ex-parte labour awards are passed must be given access to court records and that execution, including bank attachment, must be stayed pending expeditious adjudication of applications challenging the awards.

labor appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte award Labour Court Order IX Rule 13 CPC access to records

Shanghai Electric Group Company Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax

22 Dec 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:3903-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple income tax appeals as infructuous following amicable settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

tax appeal_dismissed Vivad se Vishwas Scheme income tax appeals amicable resolution infructuous appeals

Govind Swaroop Chaturvedi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

22 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3670

The Delhi High Court directed lawyers to update accurate data within two weeks to enable issuance of insurance cards and claim reimbursements under the NIACL policy, while deferring the issue of reopening registration.

administrative other insurance policies New India Assurance Company Limited data accuracy lawyers' insurance