Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
NATIONAL COTTAGE EMPORIUM v. ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LIMITED
Judgment in RFA(OS)(COMM) 53/2020 refers to the decision in RFA(OS)(COMM) No.13/2020 Alok Kumar Lodha Vs. Asian Hotels (North) Limited without additional substantive content.
Alok Kumar Lodha v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of Section 8 arbitration requires a written application, and dismissal of suits on verbal pleas without such application is appealable.
Satish Khosla & Anr v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the enforceability of the arbitration agreement, directed the parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and granted interim relief pending arbitration.
V.P. Sachdev v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in a commercial appeal involving Asian Hotels (North) Limited, referencing a related case for legal principles.
COMMERZBANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. STATE BANK OF INDIA, OVERSEAS BRANCH & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the DRT's delayed and inadequately reasoned judgments holding a foreign bank liable under Letters of Credit, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while affirming the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 despite alternative remedies.
Macpower CNC Machines Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s bids as technically non-responsive due to lack of documentary evidence of compliance, emphasizing judicial restraint in technical bid evaluations absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. MEENA RASTOGI
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the order refusing arbitration, directing the dispute to be resolved through arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD v. SUGEET BALA AHUJA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing referral of the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and stayed the judicial proceedings pending arbitration.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. B L KAPOOR & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes covered by a valid arbitration agreement must be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the lower court's order.
Indian Agro & Recycled Paper Mills Association v. Tafcon Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 40 of the Specific Relief Act, a plaintiff may amend the plaint at any stage to claim damages in substitution for injunction, and such amendment must be allowed even if belated or barred by limitation.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Sital Dass Sons
Judgment in RFA(OS)(COMM) 29/2020 refers to the decision in RFA(OS)(COMM) No.13/2020 titled Alok Kumar Lodha Vs. Asian Hotels (North) Limited without further elaboration.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. KASHMIR CARPET INDUSTRIES EMPORIUM
The Delhi High Court held that disputes covered by a valid arbitration agreement must be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and allowed the appeal directing such referral.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Trimax IT Infrastructure and Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously consider and dispose of the petition seeking vacation of stay without commenting on delay responsibility.
Apex Europe B.V. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the Trade Marks Registry to consider an IPAB order without a certified copy, subject to the petitioner providing an indemnity and undertaking affirming its genuineness.
Nafees Ahmad v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of an employee with an autistic son, holding that judicial interference in transfer orders is limited and the transfer was justified by service exigencies with adequate medical facilities available.
Parul University v. Council of Architecture
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Council of Architecture's order reducing Parul University's B.Arch intake due to faculty-facilitated mass cheating in NATA 2020, holding the Council's action under the Architects Act valid and justified.
M/S Kumar Food Industries Ltd v. SDM Alipur Delhi Through Govt of NCT and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a party against whom ex-parte labour awards are passed must be given access to records to challenge them and stayed bank attachment pending expeditious adjudication of challenge applications.
IFFC Ltd. v. JT Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's withdrawal of income tax appeal under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, facilitating settlement of tax arrears and disposing of the appeal.
Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to establish clear timelines and procedures for issuance and digital transmission of academic credentials to prevent student inconvenience and repeated litigation.
LekhraJ Meena v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an ST candidate to submit a delayed height relaxation certificate due to administrative and protest-related delays, emphasizing that reservation benefits must not be defeated by technicalities.