IFFC Ltd. v. JT Commissioner of Income Tax

Delhi High Court · 23 Dec 2020 · 2020:DHC:3718-DB
Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula
ITA 1527/2010
2020:DHC:3718-DB
tax appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's withdrawal of income tax appeal under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, facilitating settlement of tax arrears and disposing of the appeal.

Full Text
Translation output
ITA 1527/2010
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 1527/2010
IFFC LTD. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Mayank Negi with Mr. Pulkit Verma, Advocates.
VERSUS
JT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ...... Respondent
Through: Mr Parth Semwal, Advocate for Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr Standing
Counsel.
Date of Decision: 23rd December, 2020
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J (Oral):

1. Present application has been filed on behalf of appellant/assessee under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking an early hearing and withdrawal of the accompanying appeal. CM APPL. 34236/2020

2. Vide order dated 04th “Whether, while determining deduction under Section 80- I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with particular reference to February, 2013, the following substantial question of law was framed by this court:- 2020:DHC:3718-DB Section 80-I(6) thereof, unabsorbed losses of an industrial undertaking need to be determined and assessed before being available for set-off against profits of the same undertaking in a succeeding or later year?”

3. Learned counsel for the appellant/assessee states that the appellant/assessee is desirous of settling the pending litigation involving the Income Tax Department and has filed a declaration under Section 3 read with Section 4(1) of the Act, without prejudice to its rights and contentions on merits.

4. He submits that by virtue of Section 4(3) of the Act, the declarant/assessee is necessitated to withdraw the pending appeals / writ petitions in respect of ‘tax arrear’. He contends that the appellant has received the certificate u/s 5(1) on 05.11.2020 and it is now required to file proof of withdrawal of its appeal alongwith the intimation of payment of ‘tax arrear’, before the designated authority u/s 5(2) of the Act.

5. Issue notice. Mr Parth Semwal accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

6. He states that he has not objection to the present application being allowed.

7. Consequently, the present application is allowed and the appeal is taken up for hearing. Learned counsel for appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to avail the Amnesty Scheme being “Vivad se Vishwas”. With the aforesaid liberty, the present appeal stands disposed of. MANMOHAN, J SANJEEV NARULA, J DECEMBER 23, 2020 AS