Delhi High Court
99,506 judgments
Diwan Chand Aggarwal & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a writ petition challenging DDA's sanction order is not maintainable when an efficacious statutory appeal remedy under Section 31-C of the DDA Act exists.
Mohd. Musa v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 413 IPC for dealing in stolen property based on credible police evidence and lawful recoveries despite absence of independent witnesses and allegations of false implication.
Arjun & Anr. v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's policy excluding Netball from the male sports quota category, holding that such policy decisions are not subject to judicial interference unless arbitrary, and candidates cannot challenge admission guidelines after participating in the selection process.
Consortium of Autometers Alliance Ltd. and Canny Elevators Co. Ltd. v. Chief Electrical Engineer/Planning, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a contract clause requiring arbitrators to be appointed from a broad-based panel proposed by one party, directing the petitioner to nominate its arbitrator from the enlarged panel and dismissing the challenge to the clause.
Satbir v. Archaeological Survey of India
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to determine and remove illegal constructions near Tughlakabad Fort under the Ancient Monuments Act, ensuring police protection for the petitioner.
Soni Dave v. Rajinder Singh Mangat & Ors.
The Delhi High Court approved a settlement among co-owners of a leasehold property providing for sale by private treaty, mutation and conversion to freehold, and disposal of the suit accordingly.
Dhruv Krishan Maggu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 69 and 132 of the CGST Act under Article 246A, dismissed interim protection from arrest, and affirmed the jurisdiction of CGST officers to investigate and prosecute GST offences.
Ozone Spa Pvt. Ltd. v. Jyotsna Sanjay Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's summary judgment application in a franchise fee recovery suit, holding that triable issues of waiver and non-fulfillment of franchisor obligations require a full trial.
Karan Singh v. Union of India
Delhi High Court directs grant of 2nd MACP benefit with arrears to CRPF personnel from 20 years of service effective 1st January 2006, following its earlier ruling.
SK Sharma v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that enhanced Grade Pay benefits under the Ministry of Finance OM dated 13.11.2009 are available only to employees in the specified pre-revised pay scale as on 01.01.2006, excluding the petitioner.
Getamber Anand v. Dalmia Family Office Trust
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by consent of parties to adjudicate multiple disputes arising from several agreements, treating each as separate arbitral proceedings under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Vivek Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.PC to secure ends of justice despite the offence being non-compoundable.
CJ Darcl Logistics Limited v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld ONGC's six-month ban on petitioners for collusive bidding violating the Integrity Pact but ordered refund of forfeited earnest money deposits due to lack of prior demand.
Sahil Dahiya @ Tarun Dahiya v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused under MCOCA, holding that voluntary confessional statements and prima facie evidence of association with an organized crime syndicate justify denial of bail.
RITES Infrastructure Services Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the voluntary winding up petition of Rites Infrastructure Services Limited and ordered its dissolution under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 after finding compliance with all statutory requirements.
Paramjit Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery in a property sale, emphasizing the gravity of offences and ongoing investigation.
S.P. Rana v. The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that an interlocutory order dismissing an appeal as time-barred without power to condone delay is not a final judgment for Letters Patent Appeal, and such findings can be challenged after final disposal.
M/s Spartan International v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Customs appellate authority to decide the pending appeal expeditiously and in accordance with law, allowing the writ petition for this limited relief.
Dadheech Infrastructures Private Limited v. Dte Gen Md Accn Project & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees cannot be restrained by injunction merely due to contractual disputes, and termination of a determinable contract cannot be stayed by courts.
RCI Industries and Technologies Ltd v. Commissioner DGST Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of a DGST search action under GST laws, affirming cross-empowerment of Central and State GST authorities and limiting judicial review of search proceedings.