Delhi High Court
99,506 judgments
Latin India Impex Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of Latin India Impex Private Limited after finding full compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
Sunil Tyagi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that declaring an accused as a Proclaimed Offender under Section 82(4) CrPC requires strict adherence to due process and is invalid if the offence is not among those specified or summons/warrants are not duly served, quashing related FIRs under Section 174A IPC.
Parsvnath Estate Developers Pvt Ltd v. Facebook India Online Services Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes between Parsvnath and Facebook arising from their sub-license and maintenance agreements, directing interim relief applications to be decided by the arbitrator.
Gurcharan Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of promotion, holding that vacancy determination by the department based on DoP&T guidelines is final and an employee has only a right to be considered, not promoted.
M/S GPT-RAHEE (JV) v. M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that an extension of time under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 can be granted to enable an arbitral tribunal to decide a correction application under Section 33(1)(a) even after the arbitrator's mandate expires.
Gaurav Jaiswal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the authenticity of the January 2020 JEE Main scoresheet, holding that disputed factual allegations of forgery are unsuitable for summary adjudication under writ jurisdiction.
S.P. Rana v. The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that an interim order not deciding matters of moment is not appealable and clarified that the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act lacks power to condone delay, but such findings can be challenged in appeal against the final order.
Vijay v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act based on the consistent testimony of a minor victim despite minor inconsistencies and absence of medical injuries, dismissing the appellant's claim of false implication.
Beigh Construction Company Private Limited v. Varaha Infra Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim injunctions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate that the respondent was acting to defeat enforcement of any arbitral award.
M/S PVR LIMITED v. M/S ADIHM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions filed by M/s PVR Limited as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request during videoconference hearing.
Kamlaseth v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition and vacated any interim orders.
PROEX FASHION PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act is valid only during proceedings under specified sections and quashed the attachment of the petitioner's bank account made without such proceedings.
Shivashish Shubham v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directs the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension and arrears to petitioners similarly placed as in prior judgments, subject to verification and with interest on delayed payments.
Harjinder Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appointment through LDCE is a promotion, entitling government servants who joined before 01.01.2006 to exercise pay fixation options under Rule 5 of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008.
MODAK DYEING AND PRINTING CO. PVT LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed customs authorities to provide documents to the petitioner but declined to quash an appealable customs order in a writ petition, emphasizing the availability of statutory appellate remedy.
Union of India & Anr. v. Gulshan Raj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition, holding that transport allowance paid to officers on non-functional upgrade cannot be recovered in absence of employee fault or knowledge of excess payment.
Tapash Kumar Samaddar and Anr. v. Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that directors disqualified prior to 7th May 2018 are not disqualified in all companies and directed reactivation of their DIN and DSC under the Companies Fresh Start Scheme, enabling them to continue as directors and start new businesses.
Roland Corporation v. Sandeep Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that prior worldwide use of a trademark without established goodwill in India does not entitle relief against a prior Indian user, dismissing the plaintiff's passing off suit against the defendant's honest concurrent use of the BOSS mark.
Amit Kumar v. Kiran Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that children or relatives liable to maintain senior citizens have the right to appeal under Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, and permitted the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the writ petition.
EX CPL Lalit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension benefits with arrears to petitioners similarly placed as in precedent cases, subject to verification and with interest on delayed payments.