Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. Delhi High Court through Registrar General

02 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6287-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the processing of a Travelling Allowance claim filed beyond the original limitation period, holding that Covid-19 related extensions and subsequent Office Memoranda extended the limitation period applicable to retired government employees.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Travelling Allowance General Financial Rules 2017 Office Memorandum Limitation period

Nitin Kumar and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

02 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5702

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 174A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

D.S. Shankar v. Union of India

02 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6086-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings and Tribunal review orders, holding that review of a review order is impermissible and the petitioner must challenge the Presidential order through proper legal channels.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 Review Application Presidential Speaking Order

Asha Mishra v. State Through Standing Counsel & Anr.

02 Aug 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6054

The Delhi High Court allowed late production of additional documents in a probate suit under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC to ensure substantial justice, imposing costs on the party seeking delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC late production of documents testamentary suit probate of Will

Manmohan Singh v. Anju Gupta

02 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6057

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' application to recall an order fixing interim user charges during stayed eviction proceedings, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record was shown and reaffirming the discretionary nature of such compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim user charges mesne profits eviction proceedings recall of order

Jagjeet Kaur v. Anju Gupta

02 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6056

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to recall an order fixing interim user charges for commercial premises, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified recall under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim user charges recall of order review application error apparent on face of record

Union of India v. Satendar Kumar

02 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1161-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's order for failure to consider the petitioner's contentions and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal remand non-consideration of merits quashing order

Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:5694

The Delhi High Court directed enrollment of eligible DMD patients in clinical trials, release of medicines, and transparency in trial recruitment and pricing under the National Rare Diseases Policy.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy clinical trials National Rare Diseases Policy AIIMS

Ambience Commercial Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Kaur Cookies Pvt. Ltd.

01 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5704

The Delhi High Court set aside enforcement of an award rendered by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator and appointed a substitute arbitrator to conduct de novo arbitration proceedings.

arbitration petition_allowed Significant arbitration unilateral appointment arbitral award enforcement Section 14(1)(a) Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Nitya Gopal Mandal v. Pragati Bio and Renewable Energy

01 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5695

The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s deletion of the State Government as a party in a recovery suit, holding that absence of privity of contract and prior payment discharge preclude its liability under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act.

civil petition_dismissed privity of contract Section 70 Indian Contract Act Order I Rule 10 CPC necessary party

Sh. Deepak Kumar v. Smt. Manita Rani

01 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5693

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to fix specific dates for recording the respondent's evidence to expedite disposal of a decade-old divorce petition.

family other divorce petition expeditious disposal trial court directions recording of evidence

Jitender Chawla v. Binod Kumar Begwani & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5692

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to be impleaded in a tenancy suit, holding that co-ownership claims do not make him a necessary or proper party to the tenancy dispute.

civil petition_dismissed impleadment Order I Rule 10 CPC Section 151 CPC co-ownership

Tani Sandhu Bhargava v. Shumita Didi Sandhu

01 Aug 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:5633

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's possession suit on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, rejecting the defendant's unsubstantiated claim of HUF ownership and upholding the validity of the gift deed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC Hindu Undivided Family Section 14 Hindu Succession Act gift deed

Parvin Kumar Jain v. Anju Jain

01 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5636-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts retain jurisdiction to grant and enhance maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act even after divorce petition withdrawal, allowing maintenance to an adult child pursuing education and enhancing interim maintenance with interest on arrears.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 Section 24 Section 26

Insp. Manish Bhati v. Raj Kumar Mishra

01 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8585

The High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 304(I), 347, and 34 IPC and discharged accused from Section 302 IPC, holding that no prima facie case for murder was made out at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC prima facie case

Sanjeen Sahni v. Manmeet Sahni

01 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6377-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the family court's order directing the appellant to restore possession of a vehicle registered in the respondent's name, rejecting claims of ownership based on third-party funding and dismissing the appeal.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC Specific Relief Act 1963 mandatory injunction

Vaibhav Aggarwal & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5818

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC following an amicable settlement involving compensation, emphasizing prevention of abuse of judicial process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement

Sh. Vijay Kumar Jain v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5799

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 338 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and compensation paid, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR criminal negligence Section 288 IPC

Rajiv Khanna v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

01 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5802-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking protection of alleged street vending rights at Ajmal Khan Road due to lack of credible evidence of allotment and possession.

administrative petition_dismissed tehbazari rights street vending allotment license fee

Sanjay Gupta v. Richa Chandra

01 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6042
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the issuance of summons under the Domestic Violence Act, affirming that the Trial Court and appellate court properly applied their minds and that delay in filing the appeal was unjustified.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Domestic Violence Act Section 12 DV Act economic abuse condonation of delay