Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Arvind Shah v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that an Examination Report classifying objects as antiquities must provide reasons for its conclusions, and directed the authority to furnish such reasons or conduct a fresh examination, granting interim protection to the petitioners.
Arvind Shah v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that an examination report classifying objects as antiquities must provide reasons, and directed the authority to furnish such reasons or a fresh report before any coercive action is taken.
M/S Shushila Hospital v. The District Magistrate / DC (North), District
The Delhi High Court set aside the suspension and cancellation of a hospital's registration under the PCPNDT Act due to lack of evidence and non-production of forensic reports, directing de-sealing of ultrasound machines and granting relief to the petitioner.
M/S ALPINE FINLEASE LIMITED v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside RBI's cancellation of petitioner's registration certificate for failure to maintain Net Owned Fund as on a specific date and remanded the matter for fresh consideration based on updated financial compliance.
Triveni Apartments Welfare Association v. Ashwani Kumar Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for contempt after respondents assured to provide updated contact details as directed in an earlier order.
State NCT of Delhi v. Anamul Ansari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that refusal to grant extension of investigation time under Section 43D(2) UAPA is appealable under Section 21 of NIA Act but upheld the Trial Court's rejection of extension due to lack of fresh justification.
Anchit Sachdeva & Anr. v. Sudesh Sachdeva & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the suit for partition on the ground that the plaint failed to disclose a cause of action by not pleading or proving the existence of a Hindu Undivided Family or coparcenary properties, holding that self-acquired properties do not become coparcenary post the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors. v. Vinod Bharti
The Delhi High Court allowed the Government's writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to proceed before the Tribunal, ensuring that future proceedings remain uninfluenced by prior judicial observations.
Shamima Khatoon v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence, particularly discrediting key witness testimonies and last seen theory.
M/S GYAN SALES CORPORATION v. RAJENDRA PRASAD
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte order directing payment of unpaid wages and compensation to a workman, dismissing the petitioner's challenge based on non-appearance due to bona fide misunderstanding.
MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SANDEEP RATHI
The Delhi High Court held that Loss of Love and Affection is subsumed under Loss of Consortium and cannot be separately compensated, while Pain and Suffering and Loss of Amenities are distinct heads, revising compensation and interest accordingly.
Satyendra Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging ONGC's reservation policy for persons with disabilities, holding that the law mandates reservation by major disability categories but not by sub-categories, and that allocation depends on employer assessment.
Harpreet Kalsi, Prakash Airen, Ripudaman Sharama & Vashisht Rao v. Ashish Kumar
The Delhi High Court disposed of a criminal contempt reference against a litigant who apologized unconditionally for baseless allegations of bias against the trial judge in a long-pending criminal case.
Vikesh Kumar Singh v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the date of judgment by issuing a corrigendum to reflect the accurate date of pronouncement.
Ashok Kumar Shrimali v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing consideration of the petitioner’s promotion claims as consequential benefits of a prior retrospective promotion, in accordance with existing Recruitment Rules, despite institutional winding up and voluntary retirement.
Navin Kumar & Ors. v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Sashastra Seema Bal to examine and pay the petitioners' Patient Care Allowance and arrears with interest if eligible under the prescribed criteria.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Lt Col Harvinder Thakur
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal order as complied with and limited the petitioners to challenge any further orders separately.
Pravesh Grewal v. Union of India
Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing re-examination of a candidate declared unfit due to a tattoo on the right forearm after the tattoo was removed and scar healed, emphasizing fairness under recruitment medical guidelines.
Union of India & Ors. v. No. 40634Z Lt. Ak Thapa (Released)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal order, holding that it would not interfere under Article 226 when a statutory appeal to the Supreme Court is pending.
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. Raj Kumari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by correctly assessing the deceased's potential income, applying future prospects, and awarding loss of consortium to the parents.