Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that delayed electronic filing of Form 10 due to technical difficulties does not justify reassessment under Section 148 when substantive disclosures under Section 11(2) were accepted before assessment completion.
Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Tax 112 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated on incorrect premises and held that reassessment notices must be based solely on reasons existing at issuance, disallowing subsequent supplementation of grounds.
Poonam & Anr. v. Nemo
The Delhi High Court allowed waiver of the six-month statutory waiting period under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce by mutual consent, emphasizing genuine settlement and failure of reconciliation efforts.
SI Sudhir Dahiya, PS Aman Vihar v. Shatrughan
The High Court upheld the discharge of the accused in a sexual offence case due to absence of prima facie evidence and the victim's denial of assault, emphasizing the limited scope of charge framing under Sections 227 and 228 CrPC.
V.C. v. Preeti Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's delayed appeal against a family court order directing maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, holding that incomplete income disclosure justified the maintenance award.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. R&T Enterprises
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition to correct the operative portion of its earlier judgment by excluding Claim 6 and related interest from the award.
Asst Comdt Aakash Chahar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the constitution of a Board of Inquiry as premature, holding that procedural steps cannot be challenged before completion of inquiry and consequential action.
Fairfield Institute of Management and Technology v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the reduction of sanctioned intake for a law course based on final admissions data, ruling that only students assigned enrolment numbers constitute valid admissions under policy guidelines.
Puneet Arora v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrieval of call detail records beyond the statutory two-year retention period, holding that non-availability of such records does not violate the right to a fair trial.
Talim @ Talib v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner accused of possessing 51 kg ganja and heading a national drug syndicate, holding that stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for bail were not met.
Vanitha Dhanuk v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused in a neighborhood dispute, holding no violation of bail conditions or sufficient grounds for interference.
Narender Mohan Pal & Anr. v. National Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer remains liable to pay third-party compensation despite absence of a valid commercial permit, unless it proves a conscious breach by the insured, and dismissed the insurer's claim to recover compensation from the vehicle owner in this case.
Suman & Ors. v. National Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the motor accident compensation by recalculating loss of dependency with appropriate deductions and upheld the negligence and liability of the offending vehicle's driver.
Faeem and Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Balram and Anr v. State Through SHO PS Chhawala and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving minor offences arising from family disputes following an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Ankit Alias Jugnu and Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving minor offences under IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Raju Singh and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Rohit Singh Rawat v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging sexual assault and extortion, holding that disputed facts and evidence must be examined during trial and not at the quashing stage.
Nikhil Gupta v. Principal Additional Director General DGGI Gurugram Zonal Unit
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment orders under Section 83(1) CGST Act can be validly passed by authorized officers including the Principal Additional Director General and directed expeditious disposal of the petitioner's objections under Rule 159(5).
Sunil Kumar v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the orders directing registration of FIR against a police officer for alleged improper investigation, holding that the allegations did not prima facie disclose any cognizable offence and the orders were passed without proper judicial scrutiny.