Delhi High Court

35,876 judgments

Year:

Deepak Chaudhary v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2378-DB

Rajiv Shivram Khandare v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

06 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2391-DB

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. VANDANA GUPTA AND ORS

06 Aug 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2381-DB

Vinod Kumar Kataria v. Union of India and Anr

06 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2388-DB

Sunil Kumar Bakshi v. DSIDC Ltd & Anr

06 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2385-DB

Rani Devi v. Indo Tibetan Border Police

06 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2377-DB

Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Ors. v. Nirbhay Kumar Santosh

06 Aug 2021 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2025:DHC:1392-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Principal Bench's jurisdiction to entertain a transfer-related OA based on part of the cause of action arising in Delhi and affirmed the Chairman's power to retain cases under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction cause of action Central Administrative Tribunal Section 25 Administrative Tribunals Act

M/S. DELHI BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. v. M/S. SATYA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD

05 Aug 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:2355

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral interim order directing payment to sub-contractors and labourers not party to arbitration, holding such relief beyond the tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 17 Arbitration and Conciliation Act interim relief sub-contractors labourers

Glimpse Electronics Private Limited v. Vector Projects (India) Private Limited & Anr.

05 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2353-DB

Delhi High Court allowed interim relief freezing disputed funds in arbitration proceedings referred by the MSME Facilitation Council at Delhi, despite exclusive jurisdiction clause favoring Mumbai courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act interim relief territorial jurisdiction Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

Vidyanand v. Central Airmen Selection Board & Ors.

05 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2352-DB

The Delhi High Court held that strict compliance with mandatory photograph requirements in Airmen recruitment is essential and dismissed the petition seeking a fresh exam opportunity for non-compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recruitment examination mandatory conditions photograph requirement disqualification