Delhi High Court

76,521 judgments

Year:

Upendra Kumar v. Government of India and Ors.

04 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2316-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Upendra Kumar by referring to the judgment in a related writ petition, Rajiv Kumar Vs. Government of India and Ors.

other other writ petition Government of India Delhi High Court stay application

Paras Nath Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2312-DB

The Delhi High Court decided the writ petition filed by Paras Nath Yadav by applying the reasoning and judgment delivered in the earlier Rajiv Kumar case.

other other Writ Petition Union of India Delhi High Court Rajiv Kumar case

Subhash Chander v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2306-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of W.P.(C) 2165/2020 by referring to its earlier judgment in Rajiv Kumar Vs. Government of India and Ors.

other other Writ Petition Union of India Delhi High Court Rajiv Kumar case

Britannia Industries Ltd v. ITC Ltd & Ors.

04 Aug 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla

The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals concerning packaging disputes between Britannia and ITC by setting aside the interlocutory order and decreeing the suits as per the parties' settlement, leaving substantive legal questions open.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural packaging dispute passing off interlocutory application settlement

Davindra Mahey v. Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation

04 Aug 2021 · Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2305

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits against demolition orders issued by the Commissioner under the DMC Act absent jurisdictional error, and upheld the dismissal of injunctions against demolition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant jurisdiction of civil courts demolition order Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957 Section 330A DMC Act

Dr. Mahabir Prasad Yadav v. Lakshmibai College

04 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2336-DB

The Delhi High Court directed payment of the balance subsistence allowance from the date of bail release, denying interest, upholding the prospective application of Fundamental Rule 53.

administrative appeal_allowed subsistence allowance Fundamental Rule 53 suspension disciplinary proceedings

Master Dheeraj Lakra & Ors. v. Chhoto Devi & Anr.

04 Aug 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:2341

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding the suit challenging a 1984 sale deed barred by limitation and not hit by Section 33 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954.

civil appeal_dismissed limitation sale deed Delhi Land Reforms Act 1954 Section 33

Shrawan Kumar Singh v. Border Security Force and Ors.

04 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2314-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shrawan Kumar Singh against the Border Security Force by relying on the judgment in Rajiv Kumar Vs. Government of India and Ors.

administrative writ petition Border Security Force Delhi High Court administrative law

M/S SHEEL BIOTECH LTD v. RAM MOHAN NAG

03 Aug 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:2304

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award reinstating a workman and directed a fresh hearing allowing the management to defend itself, emphasizing procedural fairness and merits.

labor other Significant Labour Court ex parte award Order IX Rule 13 CPC reinstatement

Subhash Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2301-DB

The Delhi High Court held that deputationists have no vested right to permanent absorption without consent of parent and borrowing departments, dismissing petitions challenging refusal of NOCs and repatriation orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deputation permanent absorption No Objection Certificate Central Armed Police Forces

Dr Vijay Kumar Sharma v. Dy Commissioner of Police, Economic Offence Wing

03 Aug 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:2302

The Delhi High Court held that parallel investigations by different agencies under IPC and PMLA are permissible and do not violate the protection against double jeopardy under Article 20(2) of the Constitution.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45(1A) PMLA parallel investigation Article 20(2) Constitution of India

Sudev Industries Ltd v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi

03 Aug 2021 · Manmohan, J.; Navin Chawla, J. · 2021:DHC:2293-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements including denial of personal hearing, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant faceless assessment Section 144B Income Tax Act personal hearing principles of natural justice

Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. Indo Tibetan Border Police

03 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2297-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of ITBP personnel challenging their premature repatriation from Afghanistan, holding that deployment decisions are administrative and not subject to judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deployment repatriation Indo Tibetan Border Police Indian Mission Afghanistan

Sumehak Bansal v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

03 Aug 2021 · Mukta Gupta · 2021:DHC:2286

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Sumehak Bansal and anticipatory bail to Suman Bansal in a real estate fraud case, holding that limited involvement and completed investigation justify bail with conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed bail anticipatory bail power of attorney joint ownership

M/S DYNAMIC MOVERS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR v. AKHIL PODDAR

03 Aug 2021 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2021:DHC:2303

The Delhi High Court upheld the binding nature of a voluntarily executed mediation settlement in a cheque bounce case, dismissing the petitioners' attempt to repudiate it after partial compliance.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Settlement Agreement Mediation Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act

Haroon Ahmed v. Delhi Waqf Board

03 Aug 2021 · Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2289

The Delhi High Court directed desealing of a Waqf property shop and allowed the petitioner to participate in fresh bidding, holding that lease renewal requires compliance with amended Waqf Rules and eviction without due process is impermissible.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Waqf Act 1995 Waqf Properties Lease Rules 2014 Section 54 Waqf Act lease renewal

Subhash Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2300-DB

The Delhi High Court held that deputationists have no vested right to permanent absorption without consent of both parent and borrowing departments, dismissing petitions challenging refusal of NOCs and repatriation orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deputation permanent absorption No Objection Certificate Central Armed Police Forces

Chandan Bindal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Aug 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2298-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious arbitration under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act for determination of compensation, refusing to interfere with the Competent Authority's rejection of time barred claims.

property petition_dismissed Significant National Highways Act, 1956 land acquisition compensation Competent Authority

Janardan Sharma v. GNCT of Delhi

03 Aug 2021 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2021:DHC:2288

Delhi High Court held that part-time vocational teachers are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 as amended retrospectively from 1997, directing payment with interest upon retirement.

labor petition_allowed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009 part-time employee gratuity definition of employee

Sumehak Bansal v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

03 Aug 2021 · Mukta Gupta · 2021:DHC:2285

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Sumehak Bansal and anticipatory bail to Suman Bansal in a real estate fraud case, holding that limited involvement and completion of investigation justify bail.

criminal appeal_allowed bail anticipatory bail power of attorney joint ownership