Delhi High Court
76,521 judgments
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Alcatel Lucent France (Now Known As Alcatel Lucent Intl.)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming that income from software embedded in hardware is not royalty under tax law and that withholding tax payments do not attract interest under Section 234B.
Pooja v. Ministry of Ayush & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the eligibility of candidates in the third counselling round for Ayurveda post-graduate admission, holding the counselling rules were correctly interpreted and applied.
PINE LABS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ICP DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a payment dispute where the respondent failed to respond or appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement.
KRS HOME DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that a personal hearing requested under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act must be granted during faceless assessment proceedings, and failure to do so violates natural justice, leading to setting aside of the assessment order.
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation -2
The Delhi High Court quashed a TDS certificate issued without mandatory compliance to Rule 28AA, directing fresh consideration in line with the Income Tax Rules and DTAA provisions.
APEX INSTITUTE OF AYURVEDA SCIENCES v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a university established by State legislation must obtain a detailed No-Objection Certificate from the State Government as mandated by central regulations to establish a new Ayurveda Medical College, dismissing the petition challenging the rejection of such application.
Abdul Majid and Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.
Delhi High Court directed urgent infrastructural upgrades at the CGIT and ordered expeditious adjudication of terminated contractual workers’ dispute, while dismissing writ petition for lack of maintainability.
Karan Chaudhry v. Indira Gandhi National Open University and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of a student seeking permission to appear in final year exams without completing the mandatory one-year registration period and timely exam form submission as per University rules.
Panchanan International Private Limited v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Delhi High Court referred a ₹30 crore insurance claim dispute to arbitration, appointing a sole arbitrator to decide all issues including arbitrability and claim quantum.
Allied Blenders and Distillers Private Limited v. Prakash Distillery and Chemical Co Private Limited
The Delhi High Court decreed a commercial suit in terms of the parties' settlement under Order XXIII, Rule 3 CPC and granted partial refund of court fees.
Dr. Arun Kumar Mishra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that service-related disputes involving retired Central Government employees and pension matters must be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal, dismissing the writ petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Manoj Kumar Gupta v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
Delhi High Court held that possession suffices for municipal Health Trade Licence grant and set aside cancellation based on ownership dispute, directing licence reconsideration without requiring no-objection certificate from co-owners.
Manoj Kumar Gupta v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that possession suffices for grant of Health Trade Licence and set aside the condition requiring no objection certificate from co-owners, directing the municipal authority to grant licence upon compliance.
Larsen & Toubro Limited v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory minimum 12-month claim period in bank guarantees imposed by banks is a misinterpretation of Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act and quashed the impugned communications enforcing it.
Qing Shi v. State
The Delhi High Court held that an accused is entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. even if the bail application is not specifically filed under that section, provided the statutory period for filing the charge sheet has expired and the accused is ready to furnish bail.
Namanpreet S Dhillon v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner found with a single live cartridge, holding that mere unconscious possession without knowledge or intention does not constitute an offence.
Subrat Kumar Panigrahi v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitrary adverse remark and the consequent '3' grading in the appellant’s 2018-2019 ACR, directing a fresh assessment, while upholding the rejection of challenge to the 1996-1997 grading.
M/S Pioneer Publicity Corporation Private Limited v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that remission of license fee must be granted for the entire period during which the petitioner was deprived of use of advertisement sites due to removal and non-availability of feasible alternative sites, directing refund of excess fees paid.
GAIL (India) Limited v. Bansal Infratech Synergies Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award invalidating a No Claim Certificate obtained under coercion and ruled in favor of the contractor on multiple contract claims, dismissing GAIL's challenge.
Mohd. Azim v. DDA & Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal of interim injunction against DDA demolition, holding the petitioner failed to establish prima facie possession or legal right over the disputed property.